• 5.37 MB
  • 2022-06-17 15:54:21 发布

识解理论在高中英语语法教学中的应用研究

  • 56页
  • 当前文档由用户上传发布,收益归属用户
  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、本文档内容版权归属内容提供方,所产生的收益全部归内容提供方所有。如果您对本文有版权争议,可选择认领,认领后既往收益都归您。
  3. 3、本文档由用户上传,本站不保证质量和数量令人满意,可能有诸多瑕疵,付费之前,请仔细先通过免费阅读内容等途径辨别内容交易风险。如存在严重挂羊头卖狗肉之情形,可联系本站下载客服投诉处理。
  4. 文档侵权举报电话:19940600175。
分类号:密级:学校代码:10165学号:201010645逢享师筢火擎硕士学位论文⑨识解理论在高中英语语法教学中的应用研究AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchool作者姓名:学科、专业:研究方向:导师姓名:左洪岩英语语言文学语言学崔林副教授2O13年5月 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEngfishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolGrammarleacl澶ingeniorl-ligllCnOOlZuoHongyanThesisSubmittedinPartialFulfillmentoftheRequirementsFortheDegreeofMASTEROFARTSSchoolofForeignLanguagesLIAoNINGNoRM【ALUNIVERSITY2013 学位论文独创性声明本人承诺:所呈交的学位论文是本人在导师指导下所取得的研究成果。论文中除特别加以标注和致谢的地方外,不包含他人和其他机构已经撰写或发表过的研究成果,其他同志的研究成果对本人的启示和所提供的帮助,均已在论文中做了明确的声明并表示谢意。学位敝作者躲华咝!蕴:学位论文版权的使用授权书本学位论文作者完全了解辽宁师范大学有关保留、使用学位论文的规定,及学校有权保留并向国家有关部门或机构送交复印件或磁盘,允许论文被查阅和借阅。本文授权辽宁师范大学,可以将学位论文的全部或部分内容编入有关数据库并进行检索,可以采用影印、缩印或扫描等复制手段保存、汇编学位论文,并且本人电子文档的内容和纸质论文的内容相一致。保密的学位论文在解密后使用本授权书。学位论文作者签名:指导教师签名:签名El期:沙f;年厂月?1 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文摘要传统的英语语法教学将语法意义与形式分开,主张机械的背诵语法句型和规则。缺乏对句型和规则背后的意义的理解,容易造成学生语法概念模糊,对语法规则似懂非懂,进而在语言实际运用过程中,就会出现因诸多语法的错误、句式结构的混乱而造成语言表达、信息传递的失败。识解理论为英语语法教学提供了新视角,结合人类对事件的识解角度和方法,在讲解这些枯燥的语法形式基础上,进一步阐释这些结构中的深层含义,突出学习者的主体作用和一般认知能力在语法习得中的重要性。本文作者试图将识解理论运用于高中英语语法的讲解中来激发学生对英语学习的兴趣和学习动机进而提高教学效率。本文主要研究识解理论下的高中英语语法教学是否比传统教学法更有效提高教学效率以及更有效的提高学习者对英语语法学习的主动性和积极性。在介绍识解理论的定义,分类以及国内外英语语法教学的现状后,为了验证识解理论在高中英语语法教学中的有效性,一项实证性研究在葫芦岛市建昌县第一高级中学展开。研究的方法是高二年级中选取两个英语水平相当的平行班作为实验组和对照组,进行为期10周的对比教学实验,分别接受传统教学和补充了识解理论内容的教学,实验包括问卷调查,前测,后测。在对实验数据进行收集整理后,本文作者通过SPSSl6.O统计软件对数据进行了分析。分析结果表明,在实施新的教学方法后,实验班成绩有了明显提高,学生对学习英语语法也表现出了更多的兴趣。最后,基于对本研究的定量和定性分析,本文提供了一些关于识解理论运用到高中英语语法的教学建议以帮助教师们更有效的进行语法教学。本研究证明在我国高中进行培养学生认知意识的英语语法教学是一片充满希望的沃土,在不久的将来,很可能成为认知语言学研究的闪光点。本文对识解理论在英语语法教学领域的应用做出了一定的尝试,希望本研究能为英语语法教学提供有益的借鉴和启示。关键词:识解理论:高中英语语法教学:应用 AStudyontheApplicationofConsmmlTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchooIStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolAbstractThetraditionalEnglishgrammarteachingmethodsplitsthestructureandmeaning,becauseitadvocatesrecitingthegrammarstructuresandrulesmechanically.Duetothelackofunderstandingthemeaningofgrammarstructuresandrules,studentseasilyconfusethegrammarconceptionandgrammarrules.Asaresult,intheprocessofexpressingthemselves,therearelorsofgrammarmistakesanddisorderedstructures.Undoubtedly,thiswillleadtothefailureofcommunicationandinformationdelivery.ConstrualTheoryproposesanewpointofviewtoEnglishgrammarteaching.Accordingtopeople’Sconstrualangleandmethod,whenteachingthebaldgrammarstructures,teachersCanexplainthedeepmeaningofthesestructures.Inaddition,itlaysmoreemphasisontheimportanceofstudentsasmainroleandcommoncognitiveabilityinlearninggrammar.TheauthorintendstoemployConstrualTheorytotheEnglishgrammarteachingtostimulatestudents’enthusiasmandmotivationaboutgrammarandimprovetheteachingefficiency.ThisthesismainlystudieswhetherthegrammarteachingbasedonConstrualTheoryisbetterthantraditionalgrammarteachingmethodinimprovinggrammarteachingefficiencyandstimulatingstudents’enthusiasmandinitiative.AftertheintroductionofConstrualTheory’Sdefinition.classificationandthecurrenttrendsofEnglishgrammarteaching,anempiricalstudywascarriedoutinJianChangfirstSeniorHighMiddleSchoolinHuludaototestifytheeffectivenessoftheapplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishgrammarteaching.TwointactclassesofstudentsinGrade2withsimilarEnglishlevelwerechoseninthisexpefiment.OneiSExperimentalGroupand也eotheriSControlGroup.Theexperimentlasted10weeks.whichwascomposedofaquestionnaire,pretestandposttest.CGwasinstructedinthetraditionalapproachwhileEGemployedConstrualTheoryintheprocessofthegrammarteaching.Afteralltherawdatawerecollectedinthetests,scoresandresultswouldbeanalyzedbysoftwareSPSS16.0.髓eresultsshowthatafterthenewteachingmethodwasadoptedthescoresofstudentsinEGimprovedalotandstudentshaveshownmuchmoreinterestsinEnglishgrammar.Atlast,onthebasisofqualitativeandquantitativeanalyses,somesuggestionsconcerningConstrualTheoryinEnglishgrammarteachinginhighschoolareofferedtoteachersfortheirmoreeffectivegrammarteaching.111epresentstudyprovesthatteachingEnglishgrammarthroughtrainingstudents’cognitiveconsciousnessisapromisinglandinChina,whichmightbethehighlightofCognitiveLinguisticsinthecomingfuture.111epresentstudyhasmadeconsiderableattempttoⅡ AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHilghSchooltheapplicationofConstrualTheorytotheEnglishgrammarteachingandithopestoprovidesomereferenceandinspiration.KeyWords:ConstrualTheory;Englishgrammarteachinginseniorhighschool;ApplicationIII 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文Contents摘要⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..IAbstract.⋯⋯...⋯.⋯⋯..⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯.⋯...⋯.⋯...⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯.....⋯.IIChapter1Introduction.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯....11.1Backgroundofthestudy.⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯...⋯⋯...⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯..⋯l1.2SignificanceoftheStudy.⋯⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯.11.3AimsoftheStudy⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯21.4ThesisS仃uctIlre⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯一2Chapter2LiteratureReview.⋯.⋯⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯...⋯.⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯...⋯..⋯⋯..⋯.....⋯.32.1OverviewofConstrualTheory.⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯⋯..⋯...⋯..⋯.⋯⋯..⋯...⋯..⋯..⋯⋯.32.1.1DefinitionofConstrualTheory⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯32.1.2FiveDimensionsofConstrualTheory⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯32.2OverviewofCurrentTrendsinEnglishGrammarTeaching⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..92.2.1DefmitionofGrammar⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.92.2.2CurrentSituationandTrendsofGrammar-TeachingAbroadandatHome.................⋯...........................⋯..............⋯...⋯.....⋯............。......⋯..........92.3TowardaSynthesis⋯.⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯⋯..⋯..⋯...⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯....11Chapter3ResearchDesignandProcedures............................................................133.1I乇esearchPurpose⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯133.2ResearchSubjects...........................................,................................................13:;.3Materials.⋯.⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯...⋯..⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯..143.4Instruments..⋯.....。.。..........。...........。.。..。.............。.。.。。....。.....。....。。.。..。.。。.⋯。...。。........143.5ProceduresoftheResearch..............................................................................143.5.1ASampleLessonPlan⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯203.5.2InstrumentsandDataAnalysisDevice⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..23Chapter4DataPresentationandDiscussion.⋯⋯....⋯.⋯.⋯....⋯..⋯..⋯⋯..⋯...⋯......254.1DataPresentation.⋯⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯⋯..⋯..⋯..254.I.1AnalysisofResultsofthePretest.⋯.⋯⋯..⋯...⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯..⋯.254.1.2ComparisonofPosttestbetweenCGandEG⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.264.1.3ComparisonbetweenPretestandPosttestofEG⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..274.1.4ResultsoftheQuestionnaire..................................................................274.2Discussion.⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯..314.3Summary⋯.⋯.⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯.⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯..⋯...⋯..⋯.⋯..⋯⋯..⋯..⋯..⋯⋯33Chapter5Conclusion..⋯.⋯⋯..⋯.⋯⋯.⋯.。⋯.⋯⋯..⋯...⋯.⋯...⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯:;z4,!;.1MajorFindings⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯..3zl!;.2LimitationsoftheStudy....⋯.........⋯...........................................................。....:345.3PedagogicalImplications⋯⋯⋯.⋯..⋯..⋯⋯..⋯⋯..⋯...⋯⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯⋯.355.4SuggestionsforFurtherResearch⋯.⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯..⋯⋯....35References.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯..⋯⋯.⋯。..⋯.⋯⋯⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯..⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯37AppendixAPre..test....................................................................................................39AppendixBPost-test..⋯......⋯..........⋯................⋯.....,...............................................43AppendixCQuestionnaire⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..47IV Chapter1Introduction1.1BackgroundofthestudyGrammaristhepremiseofdoingEnglishreading,thekeytoEnglishwritingskillsandthebridgeofspeakingEnglishfluently.Grammarrulesforformingwordsandcombiningthemintosentences.Itisclearthatgrammarproclaimstherulesofwords-transformationandsentence-makingSOthattoleamgranllilarisanecessaryforlearningalanguage.Althoughsince1970s,theteachingmethodofcommunicationhasbeendevelopedaccordingtoHalliday’SSystemicFunctionallinguistics,theteachingofgrammarhasbeenignored.Krashen(1981)proposedthatforeignlanguageshouldbelearnednaturallyandheisalsoopposedtogrammar-teaching.Becauseoftheirinfluences,grammar-teachingbecameunimportantforEnglishlearners.Itledtoseriousconsequence.AsMariannaCelce-Marcia(2002)said,“Convincedevidenceshowsthatteachingwithoutgrammar,thoughbasedoncomprehension.willleadtoPidginforeignlanguage”.Tusi(2003)consideredthatintheprocessofsecondlanguagelearning,theproblemisnotwhethertoteachgrammarbuthowtoteachit.AndreaTyler(2005)proposedthatconsideringtheprinciplesofgrammar-teaching,thecognitionoflanguagenatureandstructureiSthemostimportantissue.GeneralismandStructuralismbothconsiderlanguageasanautonomoussystem.T11iSmadelanguagelearningbecomealistofrulesystem,wordsbankandspecialcases,whileresultinlearningalanguagebyrecitinglanguageformsandspecialcases.Obviously,learningprocesslikethismademeaningandformdividedandlowerthelearner’Ssubjectivefactors.Oppositetotraditionalteachingmethod,cognitivelinguisticsoffersanewviewpoint.Itfocusesontheaffectofhumanexperienceandcognitiveabilityonlanguagecomprehensionandapplication.ItcombinedlanguageformwithmeaningandmeaningISprimary.Langacker’SConstrualTheoryincognitivegrammaroffersUSanewviewpointtogrammar-teachingbycombiningformandmeaning。1.2SignificanceoftheStudyIntermsofthecurrentsituationofgrammarteachinginChina,somepeopleencourage‘desaltinggrammar’,focusingondevelopingcommunicationability.SomepaymoreattentiontotheinstructionofEnglishgrammar.Thesetwopointsofviewareallone—sided.ItisnecessarytorethinkprofoundlyandstudyonEnglishteachingmethodinhighsch001.“Absolutely,educationisnotmerelytogiveunilateralculturebuttoinspirehumanbeing’Screativity,helphumanrealizetheworthoflifeandgainviewpointofvalue."(PanZhonggang,2002).Withthehighschoolstudentsgrowing,theirknowledgelevelishigherandself-awarenessisstronger.Theywillexploretheinternalrulesofobjectdeveloping.ThetraditionaIteachingmethodcan’t础6ntheirrequirementwhichdemandstochangeteachingmethodtomeettheirrequirement.CognitiveGrammarholdsthatlanguageexpressionIS AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolbasedonpeople’Sperceptionexperienceandcognitiveprocesstotheoutsideworld.Grammarstructuresdependonhumancognitivesystemandsemanticstructure.InordertorepresentGrammarstructuresclearly,ConstrualTheoryisusedtorepresentsemanticstructures.ThispaperaimstoemployConstrualTheorytogrammarteachinginhighschooltoverifythegrammarteachingeffectivenessattainedthroughtheapplicationofConstrualTheory.1.3AimsoftheStudyThrough.thisresearch,theauthoraimstomakepeoplerecognizethesignificanceofConstrualTheoryforEnglishgrammar-teaching:1.ToimprovetheefficiencyoftheclassandreducetheburdenofstudentsintheprocessofEnglishgrammarteaching.ToemploytheConstrualTheorycanhelpteachersandstudentsseparatethemselvesfromlargenumberofexercises.Theprocessoflearningandteachingwillbecomemoreeffective.Theclassroomatmospherewillbecomemoreactivebyteacher’Seffectiveteachingandstudents’effectivelearning.Inthisway,studentscouldimprovetheirlearningeffectiveness.2.Toimprovestudents’interestsinEnglishgrammarlearning.Thetraditionalteachingmethodpaymoreattentiontostructure.Studentsstrengthenitbydoingalotofexercises.Asaconsequence,studentswereboredandlostinterestsinlearninggrammar.ToemployConstrualTheoryintheprocessofteachinggrammarmeanstocombinegrammarformandmeaningwhilemeaningisprimary.Thiswillmakestudentscomprehendthegrammarwiththehelpoftheirownexperienceandcognitiveabilities.Withlearninggrammarmoreinteresting,theywillbecomemoreactiveandpositiveinclass.1.4ThesisStructureThisthesisconsistsoffiveparts,includingtheintroduction.ThefirstchapterofintroductionpresentsthebackgroundofEnglishgrammarteachingandalsointroducesthesituation,significanceandpurposeoftheresearch.ChapterTwoisliteraturereviewwhichfocusesontheintroductionofrelevanttheories,suchasthedefinitionofConstrualTheory,fivedimensionsofConstrualTheoryandthecurrentstudyofEnglishgrammarteachingabroadandathome.ChapterThreeisresearchdesign,whichfocusesontheinstructionofthesubjects,instruments,andthewholeresearchproceduresinthisstudy.ChapterFourpresentstheexperimentalresultsanddiscussesabouttheexperimentalresults.ChapterFive,thelastchapter,isaconclusionforthewholestudy.Itshowsthemajorfindings,limitationofthestudy,pedagogicalimplicationsandfurthersuggestionsforfutureEnglishgrammarteachingresearch.2 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文Chapter2LiteratureReviewInthischapter,theauthorwillreviewthepreviousstudiesofconstrualtheoryandcurrenttrendsandsituationofEnglishgrammarteachingabroadandathome.2.1OverviewofConstrualTheoryCognitiveGrammaristhemainpartofCognitiveLinguistics.CognitiveLinguisticsisdifferentfromGenerativeLinguisticwhichpaysmoreattentiontolanguageform.CognitiveLinguisticstartsfrommeaningSOthatCognitiveGrammaralsostartsfrommeaning.CGclaimsthat‘‘grammarismeaningfulbecauseitembodiesandsymbolizesaparticularwayofconstruingconceptualcontent"’(Langacker1991).InCGparlance,asdescribedinLangacker(1987)andTaylor(2002),themeaningofalinguisticexpressioninvolvesnotonlyitsconceptual(objective)content,butalsohowthatcontentiSconstrued:thesyntaxofanexpressionreflectsitsconceptualorganization,andrepresentsthespecificcognitiveconstrualofthesceneitdescribes.2.1·1DefinitionofConstrualTheoryConstrualTheorybelongstoCognitiveGrammar;itreferstotheabilitytodescribethesamesituationindifferentways.CGlikensconceptualcontenttoasceneandConstrualTheoryviewsitasacertainway.Taylor(2002)considersConstrualTheoryas“theverywordingthatwechooseinordertolinguisticallyencodeasituationrestsonthemannerinwhichthesituationhasbeenmentallyconstrued”.Hamawand(2005)claimsthat“alanguagestrategywhichallowsthespeakertoconceptualizeasituationindiscourseandchoosetheappropriatestructuretorepresentitinlanguage”.Woods(2007)alsomaintainsthat“aparticularsituationcanbeconstruedinvariousways,andthewaysofcodingthesituationconstitutedifferentconceptualizations”.Thismeansthatthestructureusedisconnectedwiththecognitiveconstrualemployedandthatcognitiveconstrualchosentostructuresituationsareequaltodifferentmentalexperiences.Consequently,thecognitiveconstrualimpliedbyalinguisticexpressionconstitutesadecisivefacetofitsmeaning.2.1.2FiveDimensionsofConstrualTheoryAccordingtoLangacker’Spointofview(1991),therearefivemajordimensionsofConstrualTheory:Specificity,Scope,Figure—Background,PerspectiveandSalience.‘‘Inviewingascene,whatweactuallyseedependsonhowcloselyWeexamineit,whatwechoosetolookat,whichelementswepaymostattentionto,andwhereweviewitfrom.”(1)SpecificityAccordingtoLangacker(2008),specificityistheextentofdetailandprecisionatwhichasituationiSdescribed.Differentformationsofconstrualarerelatedtodifferentextentof3 specificity;peoplecanknowordescribeanidentityfromdifferentextentofdetailandprecious.Thethingcanbecharacterizedbysayingobject,butalsoCallbesaidgreaterspecifici旷f,印lement,brushoreventoothbrush.Similarly,uncleismorespecificthanrelative,laptopismorespecificthanmachine.Theoppositeofspecificityisschematic,thusthingisschematicwithrespecttoobject,machinewithrespecttolaptop.Toapplythesewordsinsuitablesentences,therewillbemanydifferentexpressionswitllthesamesituation.Inordertoelaboratesomeonediasomething,wecan,todifferentdegreesandindifferentways,usetheexpressionslikesomeonebrokesomethingorTomcompletelyshatteredthetoothbrushinthebathroomorevenmorespecificTomecompletelyshatteredMary"stoothbrushinthebathroombyhittingitsolidlywithabrandnewwoodenhandledclawhammer.Thelastsentenceisspecificenough.Aschematicexpressionisinstantiatedorelaboratedbyanynumberofmorespecificones(ZhaoYanfang2001).Wecanproduceanexpressionasspecificaspossible.Andinthisway,characterizeasituationingreaterdetail.(2)ScopeScopereferstotheconfigurationofactivatedconceptualcontent;itcontainsBaseandProfileatleast.ScopeissimilartoCognitiveDomainwhichistheprocessionandresultofconceptualization.InthisprocessCognitiveDomainformsanintemal,coherentdomain,wecanproceedsemanticdepictbasedonit.Foreachdomain,anexpressionhasascopeconsistingofitsactivationinthatdomain.Theexpression’Sscopeisitsconceptualcontentinthesubjectiveviewingflameexistinginitscomprehension.ScopeCanalsobearrangedforforegroundandbackgroundalignment.Anexpression’SscopeCansometimesconsistofitsmaximalscopeinacertaindomain,i.e.thefullextentofitsactivation,andanimmediatescope,thepartdirectlyrelevantforacertainpurpose.Theimmediatescopeisthusforegrounded,relativetothemaximalscope.Metaphorically,itcanbedescribedastheonstageregion,thegenerallocationofattention.Scopecanalsobearrangedintermsofforeground/backgroundalignment.Anexpression’SscopeCansometimesconsistofitsmaximalscopeinacertaindomain,thefullextentofitsactivation,andanimmediatescopewhichisthepartdirectlyrelevantforacertainpurposeSkehan(1998).Theimmediatescopeisthusforegrounded,relativetothemaximalscope.Metaphorically,itcanbedescribedastheonstageregion,thegenerallocationofattention.Forexample,arm>hand>finger>knuckle.Herearmprovidesaspacedomainforhand,handforfinger,etc.ThesuperiorstepImmediateScopeofhead,arm,legisbody.TheyeachhasbelowstepofImmediateScope,suchastheimmediateScopeoflegisthigh,knee,CruS,etc.TheimmediateScopeisrelatedtoSpecificity,somegrammarconstructionbasedonit.Forexample,(_1)Thishousehas7doors.Eachdoorhas3hinges.Eachhingehas6screws.(至)Thishousehas21hinges/126screws.@Thisdoorhas18screws.Inthesethreesentences,thefirstsentenceseemsmoreacceptable,becauseamanifestationofmaximal/immediate4 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文scopeiscompoundandthecomponentsindicateadjoininglevelsinawhole-partrelationship,whileskippinglevelsusuallyleadstOaninfelicitousphrase.Thereforethefirstsentenceisacceptablewhilethesecondandthethirdareunacceptable.(3)SalienceorProminenceAsitsbase.anexpressionevokesaparticularconceptionwithinwhichitdesignatessomefactorsbyplacingthemonstageasthefocusofattention.Thesefactorsareaccordedaspecialquality,whichLangacker(2008)termssalienceorprominence.Wehavethecognitiveabilitytoconfirmattentionorientationandfocalpoint,thecognitiveabilityisthecognitivefoundationtoformSalienceorProminence.Forexample,thesportivefigures(flyingbird)areeasiertoattractourattentionthansmilefigures(trees,board).Saliencereferstothequalityofacomponentinanexpressionofbeingobvious,noticeable,andconspicuous.SalienceiSthenamentaloperationallowingthelanguageusertogivethefactorofanexpressionsomedegreeofsignificantnotabilityandeminence.Incognitivelinguistics,Prominenceisoneofthemainbasestowordcategorydivisionandsyntaxanalysis.Grammarconstructionismainlyaboutthespeaker’Sreflectiontothesurroundingenvironmentintheconceptualprocess,whilethisconceptualprocessisrestrictedbytheattentionprinciples.Theparticipantsofprominence,especiallytheagent,becomethesubjectoftheclause;thechoiceofverbsshouldcoherewiththechoiceofsubjectandobject;Place,timeandotherrelativeelementscouldbedescribedbyadverbialmodifier.CGpositstwoparticularsortsofprominence:Profiling-BaseandTrajectory—Landmark.Conceptualbasereferstoanexpressionchoosesaparticularconceptualcontentasthebasisforitsmeaning.AmaximalscopeoranimmediatescopeCanbeanexpression’Sconceptualbase.TheprofileiStheparticularsubstructurewhichgraspstheattention.ThusthefocusofattentioniSanexpression’SprofileanditCanbeconsideredaswhattheexpressiondirectlydesignatesorreferstowithinitsconceptualbase.Forexample,knee,itsmaximalscopeisthoughttobehumanbody,whiletheimmediatescopeistheconceptionofategwhichisplacedonstageasthegenerallocationofaRention.Thereisasituationthattwoormoreexpressionssharethesameconceptualcontentyetcontrastinmeaningonaccountofprofilingdifferentsubstructuresorfacetsoftheexpressionswiththesameconceptualbase.Forinstance,theconceptionofaweekfunctionsastheconceptualbaseforMonday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday,Saturday,Sunday.Theydiffersemanticallybecausetheyrefertodifferentparts.Yetcertainly,weekdesignatesthewhole.Trajectory—Landmark:Besidesathing,anexpressioncanalsoprofilearelationship.Withinlangacker’SCGmodel,athingusuallyreferstoanoundesignatingaregionthatabstractlydescribeasetofinterconnectedentities,whilearelationshipmanifeststheinterconnectionsbetweentheseparticipatingentities.Profilingisoneofthedescriptiveconceptsreferringtofocusofattention.Forexample,ThecatisonthematandThematisonthecat.Bothofthesentencesareprofilingtherelation‘"on”,thetwosentencesdescribe5 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchooldifferentspacerelationship,SOtheyhavedifferentmeanings.Ingeneral,inapairorateamrelationshipmayhaveoneormore‘focalelements’,whichcanbecalledparticipants.Theyespeciallyattractattention,themostsaliencepartistrajectoryandotherpartsarelandmarks.Trajectoryistheinitialfocus,FirstParticipant.InLangacker(2008)’Spointofview,TrajectoryandLandmarkcanbecharacterizedrespectivelyasprimaryandsecondaryfigurewithaprofiledrelationship.ThismeansthatthelandmarknotonlycanbebackgroundbutalsoCanbecomesecondaryfigure.(4)Perspective“Ifconceptual/zation(metaphorically)istheviewingofascene,perspectiveistheviewingarrangement,WhichiStheoverallrelationshipbetweenthe‘viewers’andthesituationbeing‘viewed’(Langacker2008).”Theviewingarrangementincludesthreefactors,vantagepoint,subjectiveVS.objectiveandgrounding.Thevantagepointisthelocusfromwhichaspeakerorhearerobservesasituation.Asceneisconstruedfromtheperspectivewhichisdecidedbythecertainlocusoftheviewer.Thesubjectorobjectoftheperceptioninfluencetheperspective,becausetheperspectiveisconcernedwithwhethertheviewerisdesignatedassubjectorobject.Thegroundingoftheconceptualizationenablestheparticipantstoestablishmentalcontactwiththedesignatedentity.①TheVantagePointThevantagepointistheparticularlocationofthespeakerandhearer.Thesamesituationcanbeviewedandcharacterizedfromanynumberofdifferentvantagepoints,resultingindifferentcognitiveconstrualwhichmayinturnbringaboutdifferentlinguisticconsequences.VantageiSausefulconstrualconstruct.thechoiceoftrajectoryandlandmarklcadtothesemanticcontrast.Forexample,infi"ontofandbehindidentifythetrajectory’Slocationagainstthe1andmark.Ifweobserveascenewithacomputerandamouse,ifthecomputer,mouseandvantagepointareinalignment,andtheadvantagepointisthatthemouseliesbetweenthespeakerandthecomputer.wecanmakeasentenceThemouse(加)括infrontofthecomputer(1m)andThecomputer(tOisbehindthemouse(Tm);ifthevantagepointisthatcomputerliesbetweenspeakerandthemouse.wecanmakeasentence:Thecomputer(t0西infrontofthemouse(1m)andThemouse(川iSbehindthecomputer(1m).Thevantagepointdidn’tmakesignificantdifferenceincontentorprofilingofthesentences.Vantagepointcanalsoconstruetimedomain.Forexample,inthesentenceHegraduatedfromhighschoollastmonth.Thephraselastmonthevokestheconceptionoftwelvemonthsasitsconceptualbase.Inthesemonths,itdesignatesthemonthimmediatelyprecedingtheonecontainingthevantagepointoftime.Thisvantagepointisequatedwiththespeechtime.Ofcourse,thevantagepointdoesnothavetoinvariablyamounttothetimeofspeaking.WecansayJohntoldmelastweek。‘"Igraduatedfromhighschoollastmonth”.Lastmonthadoptsatemporalvantagepointcountingasthetimeofthemain--clauseoccurrence:themonthistheoneimmediatelyprecedingthemonthwhenJohnpresentedtheinformationnotthemonthwhen6 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文thesentencelSuttered.②SubjectivityVS.ObjectivitySubjectiveconstrualischaracteristicoftheviewer’Sroleasanunperceivedoffstageregion.Incontract,objectiveconstrualcharacterizestheonstagefocusofattention,whichdoesnotparticipateinviewing.Anobjectivelyconstruedentityisclearlymoresalientthanasubjectivelyconstruedentity.Objectiveconstrualisrelatedtoprofilingandexplicitmention,andsubjectiveconstrualisconcernedwithanimplicitlocusofconsciousness.Beingimplicitisnotthesameasbeingabsent。however.Theconceptualizationconstitutinganexpression’Smeaningextendsbeyonditsonstagecontent,furtherencompassingitsmodeofapprehensionbytheoffstageconceptualizesinthecontextoftheoverallviewingForexample,weobviouslyrefertothefourfactorsbuyer,goods,sellerandmoneywhenwementionbuysomething.111eyformtheframeof[buy],whichCanbeusedtoindicatetypical[COMMERCIALEVENT】flame.111efourfactorsembodythatdifferentperspectivesprominencedifferentrelationshipoffactorsinthesameframe,SOdifferentrepresentationsemerge.Humanchoosedifferentverbsandthisindicatesemanticrelationshipoftheseverbs.Ifwesay(1)JohnboughtabookfromTomfo厂28dollars.Therelationshipofbuyerandgoodsismadeprominent.(2)Johnpaid28dollarstoTomfo厂aboo&Wemaketherelationshipofbuyerandmoneyprominent.(3)TomsoldabooktoJohnfo,.28dollars.Therelationshipofgoodsandsellerismadeprominent(4)TomchargedJohn28dollarsforabooLWemaketherelationshipofmoneyandsellerprominent.③GroundandGroundingTheterm‘ground’refersto“thecontextofthespeechevent”(Taylor2002).andisusedforthespeakerandhearer,thespeechevent,theirimmediatesituation,etc.Groundingisaprocessthatsituatesanentityinregardtotheground.Facetsofthegroundtendtoserveastacitpointsofreferenceforsituatingthelocationofmoreobjectivelyconstruedentitiesagainsttheground.Thegroundfunctionsasanimplicitpointofreferenceforeveryfullnominalandeveryfiniteclause.Tense,forexample,isgenerallyestimatedfromtheground:was,is,andwillberefertopast,present,andfutureinregardtothespeechtime.Thetensemarkergroundsthisprocessbyrelatingittothespeechtime.Thus,afiniteclauseisagroundedclause,whileanonfiniteclauseisanungroundedclauseduetothelackoftenseinflection.Thenominalcounterpartoftenseisdefiniteness,asinthecomparisonbetweenatree(indefinite)andthetree(definite).Definitenesscorrelatestothespeakerandhearer,foritreliesonwhetheritsreferentisapparenttothespeakerandhearer.Articlesanddemonstrativesgroundthedesignatedthingbyrelatingittothespeechcontext.Inthenominalandverbalcases,asLangacker(2008)believes,“thegroundandthegroundingrelationshiparesubjectivelyconstrued;itisonlythegroundedentitythingoraprocess·--·thatisonstageasthefocusofattenfion”.(5)MentalScanning7 Asaresultoftheconstruer’Sscanningmodes,differentmeaningsmaybeconveyedbydifferentexpressions.Scanningisakindofmentaloperationwhichconsistsoftwoparts:summaryscannmgandsequentialscanning.Thesummaryscanningrepresentstheresultofthescanningprocess,andthesequentialscanninghighlightsthescanningprocessasitexpandsthroughtheconceivedtime(thetimeofitsoccurrence).ThesameconceptualCOntentcanbeconstruedasaprocessoranon-processrelationshipbyjudgingwhetheritisscannedviasequentialorsummaryfashion.SequentialScanningisamentalaccessingofaneventasitexpandsthroughtime.Intheprocessofsequentialscanning,thecomponentstates(orrelationships)ofaneventconceptionarementallytrackedthroughprocessingtime(thetimeofanevent’Sconception)inthesequenceoftheiroccurrencethroughconceivedtime(thetimeofitsoccurrence),andfurther,justonecomponentstateishandledatagivenprocessinginstant(Broccias2007).Inotherwords,thecomponentstatesaresequentiallytrackedthroughprocessingtimeinthewaythat,atagivenprocessingmoment,theonlyfocusedstatecorrespondstoitsconceivedmoment.Summaryscanningisthementalsuperimposingofthecomponentstatesofaneventtrackedintheirnaturalsequence,‘‘thusbuildingupacomplexprofileconsistingofthesimultaneousactivationofthecomponentstates(Taylor2002).”Ateachprocessingmoment,thefocusedconceptionconsistsofallthestatesthusfarscannedthroughtheconceivedtime.Finally,allthecomponentstatesaresimultaneouslyactivated.whichconstituteasinglegestalt.Thetermprocessisproposedforacomplexrelationshipthatprogressesthroughconceivedtime(themanifestationofaprocessatanyoneinstantiSitselfarelationship)andisscannedsequentiallyalongthistemporalaxis(aprocessrelationistemporalinthesensethatdevelopmentthroughtimeiSinfocusoressentialtoitscharacterization).ThesameconceptualcontentCanthereforebeconstruedaseitheraprocess(temporal)oranon-process(,atemporal)relationship,relyingonwhetheritisscannedviasequentialorsummaryfashion.AbasictenetofCGiSthataverbdesignatesaprocess.Sequentialscanningisthusappliedtoaverb.Whenthesameconceptualbaseisconstruedinsummarymode,theresultantexpressionbelongstOanonf"miteverbsuchasaninfinitiveandaparticiple.Additionally,apart舶mnon.processrelationships,summaryscanningisalsoappliedtothings.Theyconstituteanaturalgroupingvis—a—visprocessrelationships.Inthispart,wehavediscussedtheConstrualTheoryandfivedimensionsofthetheory:specificity,perspective,salience,mentalscanningandfigure-ground(WangYin2006).ItishelpfulforteachersandlearnerstoteachandlearnEnglishgrammartoapplyingConstrualTheory.BasedonConstrualTheory,bothteachersandlearnerscanusethedimensionsofConstrualTheorytodealwithEnglishgrammarinamoreefficientway.8 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文2.2OverviewofCurrentTrendsinEnglishGrammarTeachingGrammarteachingisakeypointinteachingEnglish.AccordingtotheNewCurriculumReformonseniormiddleschoolwhichemphasizesonthestudents’languageability,tolearnEnglishgrammarbecomesmoreimportant.、7l,hilemostEnglishteachersteachEnglishgrammarinatraditionalteacher-centeredway,studentsstillbelievegrammarclassdullandwithalowefficiency.Teachinggranlmarmeansexplainingthestructurestotheclassanddoingmanyexerciseswhathasbeenpreparedbeforeclass.However,itisnotaneffectivewaytoteachgrammar.Studentsknowwhattherulesareafterlearninggrammar,whiletheycall’tusethemproperlywhencommunicatingwithothers.Soitissignificantforteacherstofindagoodwaytosolvetheseproblems.2.2.1DefinitionofGrammarOxfordAdvancesLearner"sDictionaryofCurrentEnglishdefinesGrammarasbelow:Grammaristhestudyofscienceofrulesforthecombinationofwordsintosentence(syntax),andtheformsofwords(morphology).Grammaristhestudyofmeoftherulesbywhichwordschangetheirformsandarecombinedintosentences.(ModemChineseDictionary)Grammaristherulesoflanguagestructures,includingmorphologyandsyntax.(CiHai)Aboveall,itisclearthatGrammaristhestudyoftherulesofmorphologyandthestructuresofsyntax.2.2.2CurrentSituationandTrendsofGrammar-TeachingAbroadandatHomeInthepastfewdecades,GrammarTeachinghasbeenignoredandmanylinguistspointoutthatGrammarteachingisuselessandlanguageshouldbeobtainedbyengaginginmaterialsnaturallynotbyleamingthestructuresformally.WhilethecurrentstudiesaboutthesecondlanguagelearningmakepeoplerecognizethatGrammarTeachingishelpfultothelanguageacquisition.ShuDingfang(1996)pointedoutthatinsecondlanguagelearning,theproblemofGrammarteachingisnottoteachitornotbutwhatandhowtoteachit.2.2.2.1AnOverviewofCurrentTrendsinEnglishGrammarTeachingandLearningAbroadWiththedevelopmentofcommunicationmethodinforeignteaching,thestatusofgrammarteachinghasbeenweakenedsince1970s.EspeciallyundertheinfluenceofKrashen’Snaturalapproach,itprotestedtoobtaintheknowledgethroughpracticeandopposedgrammarteaching.BecauseofthepsychologicalperspectiveofKrashen,grammarteachingdisappearedintheclassroomSOthatitdeeplyinfluencedtheoveralldevelopmentofstudents’learningability.AsMariannaCelce-Marcia(2002)said,withoutgrammarteaching,itwasn’tcomprehensiveEnglishteaching.However,becauseofignoringgrammar,students’abilityofapplyingEnglishWasseriouslyimpacted.Throughlongtimeself-examination,grammarteachingreturnedtheforeignlanguageteachingstage.Accordingtothehistoryofgrammarteachingabroad,educationresearchersalwaysarguewitheachotheronwhethertoteachgrammarornotandhowtoteach.Since1990s,theresearchershavebeenarguingon9 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHi【ghSchooltwoformsofteachingmethod:grammar-translationapproachanddirectapproach.Grammar-translationapproachpointsthatgrammariscentreoflanguageandgrammar-translationisthemaintaskofgrammarteaching(JiangWeifen2005).Accordingtothisapproach,teachersmainlyanalyzethesentencesstructures,vocabularies,phrasesetcinthebook.Theyintroducegrammarrulesfirstandthenpracticethem.Thisapproachemphasesgrammaranalyzingcalledform—orientedgrammarteaching.Directapproachdoesn’tadvocategrammar-translationapproachbutintroducestudentsthegrammarbysummingup.First,teachergivesstudentssomeexamplesandletsthemfindtheregularpattern.Theapproachmainlyfocusesondevelopingstudents’communicationabilityandlearnsgrammarinameaningfulandcomprehensibleenvironment.It’Salsocalledimplicitgratnmarteachingandmeaning—focusedinstruction(LeiJun2006).Inthepastdecade。researchershavetriedalotabouthowtocombinethegrammarteachingwithlanguagecommunication,includingprocessinginstruction.intemationalfeedl]Iackanddiscourse.basedapproaches.VanPatten(2002)pointsthatanaccessibleteachingmethodinlanguagecommunicationistoprocesstheinputlanguagecalledprocessinginstruction.Thisapproachistocombinethegrammarteachingwithaseriesofprocessingactivitiesofinputlanguage.Itaimstohelplearnerscleartheobjectoflearninggrammarandcomprehendthegrammarrulestodeveloptheiroutputability.Internationalfeedbackreferstopromoteunderstandingintheprocedureofcommunication.1anguagelearnersmakeallkindsofmeaningconsultingandstrategiesrecomposing.Thismakes1earnersrecognizetheformoftargetlanguageunconsciouslyfLyster&Ranta1997).Thediscourse-basedapproachesadvocatethatthroughapplyingpureandsimplifieddiscourseincludingdiscourseanalysis.Itprovideslargesumsoftargetlanguagestructureswithproperundergroundforlearnersinordertoconnectformwithmeaning.Inall,withthedevelopmentofEnglishgrammarteachingrecognition,grammarteachingexperienceddifferentformsofdevelopmentandevolution.TheadvancedgrammarteachingtheoriesabroadrenewedtheconceptofOurChineseresearchersandmaketremendouseffectonEnglishgrammarteachinginchina.2.2.2.2AnOverviewofCurrentTrendsinEnglishGrammarTeachingandLearningathomeIntermsofthemaintrendsofEnglishGrammar-teachinginchina,theproblemsofgrammarteachingaretheresultsoflongtimeusingofgrammar-translationmethodandteacher’Sone.sidedcomprehensionaboutgrammar-teaching.TeachersalwaysconsiderthatgrammaristherulesoflanguageSOthattheyignorethecommunicationalfunctionofgrammar.Nowadays,grammarteachingisfromoneextremetotheother.AllkindsofEnglishbooksarepayinglessattentiontogrammarteachingandthecontentofgrammarandthetimeusedforgrammarteachingarebecominglessandless.Grammarasapartofclassteachingisalsoignored.Manystudentslearngrammarbyhiringtutor,takinglessonsafterschoolorlearnitbythemselves.Theseproblemsweakentheeffectofgrammarteachinginclass.Englishgrammarteachingmethodisalwaystraditionalteachingmethod.Teachers1n 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文analyzeandexplainthestructuresofgrammarandstudentsdoexercisesaccordingtotheteacher’Sinstruction.Thismethodiseasytomakestudentsfeeltired,boringorevenfeelanxious.What’Smore,thismethodpaysmoreaaentiontolearninglanguageknowledgeandanalyzingthestructuresofgrammar.Itignoresstudents’developmentofcreativenessandleadstothestudentsrecitingthestructuresandsentencepaaems.Becauseofthis,studentsmustmakemanygrammarmistakesandhaveabadeffectontheconductofcommunicationintheprocessoflanguageapplying(Ellis1995).AlthoughnewtheoriesaboutEnglishgrammarareproposedrecently,thebasicviewoflanguageisnotchanged.CognitiveLinguisticsprovidenewpointofviewtotheEnglishgrammarteaching.Tusi(2003)andZheng(2005)pointsthatEnglishteachersarepractitioner,decisionmakerandreformerinclass.Theirattitudestowardsteachingreformationandhowtoreformhavegreatinfluenceontheteachingreformationeffect.Newcurriculumstandardsputforwardthatclassroomteachingshouldchangetheteachingmodelofteacher-centeredwhoonlyteachtheknowledgeinthebooks.111eyshouldhelpstudentsgrasptheabilityofexploringknowledgeandautonomouslearning.Soteacherplaysamainroleintheteachingprocess.Inthepreviousstudies,therearelotsofbooksandarticlestalkingaboutforeignlanguageteachingespeciallyforuniversities,whiletherearefewarticlesabouthowteachersinhighschoolinfluencethegrammarteaching.Inordertogetabettergrammarteachingefficiency,itisnecessaryforteacherstoapplymoretheoriestoteachEnglishgrammar.ConstrualTheorywillprovideanewteachingmethodforteacherstoevokestudents’interestsandimprovetheteachingeffect.2.3TowardaSynthesisConstrualTheoryasapartofcognitivegrammar,ithassomeimportantimplicationsforourEnglishgrammarteaching.AccordingtotheConstrualTheory,wecanexplainandcomprehendagrammarstructurebyourexperienceandperception.Lakoff(2002)highlightstheroleofmetaphoricalthinkingbasedonbodyexperiencesinmeaningunderstandinganditISnecessarytounderstandthemeaningaccordingtodifferencesinknowledge,culture,value,etc.LangackerusedConstrualTheorytorefertothatpeoplecouldbefromdifferentperspective,choosingdifferentscopeandhighlightingdifferentfocustoachievethepurposeofexpression.TheideasandprinciplesofConstrualTheoryCanbeappliedtoourteachingprocessSOastoachieveteachinggoalsofimprovingstudents’abilitiesoflearningEnglishgrammarandstimulatetheirmotivationandinitiation.ThenewperspectiveoftheresearchiSexpectedtoshedsomelightsonthenewEnglishteachingmethodwithConstrualTheoryinseniorhighsch001.ThefivedimensionsofConstrualTheorywillbeusedintheprocessofteachingEnglishgrammarwhichisahugechallengeforteachersandstudents.Whileintheprocess,studentsandteachermustcooperatewitheachotherintentlySOastoreachahighteachingandlearningefficiency.What’Smore,studentswillhavemoreopportunitiestoexpresstheir AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHi【ghSchoo!ideasandcomprehensions.Teacherwillnotonlyexplainthestmcturesandgrammarrulesbutleadsstudentstounderstandthemeaningofthestructuresandrules.Thenewteachingmethodintendstoconnecttheabstractgrammarwithstudents’personalexperienceSOastoimproveteachingeffectiveness. 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文Chapter3ResearchDesignandProceduresAftertherepresentationofthetheoreticalbackgroundaboutConstrualTheoryandGrammarteaching,theresearchwillemployquestionnaireandtwoteststoexaminetherolethattheConstrualTheorymayplayinEnglishgrammarteaching.Witlltheincreasingofstudents’experience,teacherscandevelopstudents’cognitiveconsciousnesstohelpthemselvesunderstandEnglishgrammar.AlthoughEnglishteachingandlearninginChinaismainlyexam-oriented,teachersshouldprovidemoreandmoreopportunitiesforstudentstospeakout.Theresearchaimstodiscoverwhether,withthenewteachingmethod,learnersinEGcanmakeasignificantprogresscomparingwithlearnersinCGafteranexperimentalsemester.3.1ResearchPurposeWiththediscussingofthepreviouschapters,alittleworkhasbeendoneonapplyingConstmalTheoryonEnglishgrammarteachingandlearning.ThispaperaimstobridgethegapbetweentheoreticalresearchonConstrualTheoryandConstrualTheoryinEnglishgrammarteachingstudy.TheempiricalstudyisgroundedontheassumptionthatapplyingConstrualTheoryinEnglishgrammarteachinginhighschoolwillimprovehighschoolstudents’interestsinEnglishandthusfacilitatetheirgrammarlearning.Theresearchquestionsareasfollows:(1)IsgrammarteachingbasedonConstrualtheorybetterthantraditionalgrammarteachingmethodinimprovinggrammarteachingefficiency?(2)Isgrammarteachingbasedonconstrualtheorybetterthantraditionalgrammarteachingmethodinstimulatingstudents’enthusiasmandinitiative?Inordertoanswerthetwoquestions,theauthorproposesthefollowinghypothesis:Ho:Thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthemeanscoresinthecontrolgroupandtheexperimentalgroupafterthetreatment.Hi:Thereisasignificantdifferencebetweenthemeanscoresinthecontrolgroupandtheexperimentalgroupafterpropertreatment.3.2ResearchSubjectsThesubjectsinthisstudyweresecond—yearstudentsofseniorhighfromtwointactparallelclassesinJianchangFirstSeniorHighSchoolinHuludao.Therewerestudentswhosharedthesameeducationbackgroundandlanguagelevel.NoneofthemhadeverreceivedanyinstructionsconcerningConstrualTheorybefore.Thestudentsinclasstwowereclassedasexperimentalgroup(EG),whilethestudentsinclassonewereclassedascontrolgroup(CG).Theexperimentalgroupwascomposedof61students,whilethecontrolgroup59students.TheyhadthesimilarleamingbackgroundwiththeinstructionofthesameteacherwhoadoptedtwodifferentapproachestoteachthemEnglishforthreemonths.Theyhadfive periodsofEnglisheveryweekandeachperiodlasts45minutes.3.3MaterialsTheteachingmaterialWaSThePEPhighschoolEnglishtextbookswhichwasavailabletoallthesubjects.Inaddition,thematerialfortheexperimentwerederivedfromWangYin’SAnintroductiontoCognitiveGrammar(2006).Langacker’SFoundationofCognitiveGrammar(1991).TheGrammarwhichwasselectedwasfromthePEPhighschoolEnglishtextbookCompulsory5.3.4InstrumentsTheinstrumentsusedmthisresearchwerepretestandposttestWhichweregwentothestudentsbothfromEGandCGbeforeandaftertheexperimentrespectively;apre—experimentalquestionnaireandapostexperimentalquestionnairewerehandedouttothestudentsfromEGtocheckwhethertherewassignificantchangeontheparticipants’learningattitude.1earningmethodsandlearningenthusiaSms.EXCELwasusedtoanalyzetheresultsofthequestionnaire;SPSS(16.01softwarewasusedtocalculatethedatacollectedfromtheexperiment.3.5ProceduresoftheResearchThetwogroupswereexposedtothesametextbookandtreatedwiththeidenticalamountoftimefor10weeksfromSeptember18thtoNovember23rd,2012.TheyaretaughtonMondaytoFriday,eachdayforoneperiod.Eachperiodconsistsof45minutes.Theresearcheremployedthe15‘weekforthequestionnaire1andthe2们weekforthepre-test,the12也weekforthepost-testandquestionnaire2.Inthisprocess,students’scoresandattitudestowardlearningEnglishgrammarwerecollectedandanalyzedbytheresearcher.neworkingschedulefortheexperimentwasasfollows:ATimelinefortheResearch:Week1Questionnaire1Week2pretestWeek2-llTeachingWeek12posttestandquestionnaire2Inthisresearchtheresearcherillustratedthedetaileddescriptionofthestagesasfollows:first.aquestionnairewasdesignedandgivenawaytostudentsfromEG.ThequestionnairewasdesignedinChinesetoensureeverystudentcouldunderstandthemeaningofeachquestionwithoutanymisunderstanding.Thenthedatawerecollectedandanalyzedtofindouttheparticipants’personalopinionsonEnglishteachingmethodandwhattheyreallydoduringlearningEnglishgrammar.Asthequestionswerecloselyrelatedtothepracticalsituationofparticipants,fewofthemshowedresentmenttothetaskandthereturnratewas100%,whichincreasedthereliabilityofthedataderivedfromthesurvey.Theexperimentalteachingperiodtook10weeks,whichwasconductedfromSeptember14 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文l8山toNovember23mwithoneweek’Sbreak(NationalDay).Duringtheresearch,bothEGandCGwereinstructedbytheresearcher.Theteachingofthetwogroupsusedthesanletextbooks—thePEPhi曲schoolEnglishbookforgrade2studentsinhighschoolfollowedthesamesyllabus,classhours(45minuteseachday).TheonlydifferencewasthatstudentsinCGweretaughtbythetraditionalmethod,whilestudentsinEGweretaughtsimilarlybutwithinterventionbyintegratingtheteachingofthecomprehensionmethodsfromConstrualTheoryintothecontentteaching.Inthefirststage,subjectsinthecontrolgroupweregivengrammarstructures.Theteacherexplainsthestructuresbyindicatingthesubjects,predicate,objectsorwhichismainclauseandwhichissubordinateclauseetc.Thentheteacherwillwritesomeexamplesontheblackboardaccordingtothegrammarstructures.Thestudentstakenotesandreadthesentencesaloud.Finally,theteacherwillwritesomesentencesinChineseontheblackboardtohavethestudentstranslatedtheminEnglish.Afterclass,studentswilldoalotofexercisestoconcretethegrammarswhattheylearnedinclass.Whileintheexperimentalgroup,thesubjectsweretaughtinthesimilarwaysbutwithinterventionbyintegratingtheConstrualTheoryintoteachingprocess.First,accordingtotheTrajectory·LandmarktheorytheteachershowsthesentencestructuresonPPTindynamicwaysandtheteachershowsthesubjectsandobjectswithdifferentcolors.Inthisway,students’aaentionwillbegrasped.TheteacherexplainsthegrammarpointsinthetraditionalwayandthenmakesafurtherexplanationtoindicatethedeepermeaningofthestructureswiththedimensionsofConstrualTheory.AccordingtotheConstrualTheory,wecanexplainandcomprehendagrammarstructurebyourexperienceandperception.Langackerusedthistermtorefertothatpeoplecouldbefromdifferentperspective,choosingdifferentscope,highlightingdifferentfocustoachievethepurposeofexpression.Thistermemphasizespeople’Ssubjectivefactors.WiththeaimtohaveanoverviewoftheteachingstrategiesemployedinEG,theauthorwillgivesomeexampleswiththedimensionsoftheConstrualTheory.Exzamplel:therearealotofwaystoexpressemphasisandit-stressedsentenceisthemostcommonone.Inthewrittenform,peopleCan’tdistinguishthemaininformationandtheminorinformationaccordingtothetonebuttheyCandistinguishthemaccordingtotheexchangeofspeechorderandsentencepaaern.Inordertoemphasisthesubject,object,adverbialmodifier,predictiveetc,theycanbeputbehind“itis/was’’aspredictiveandthewholestructureassubject.Theotherpartsareputbehind‘‘that”asobjectorcomplement.Inthetraditionalwaytoteachit-stressedsentence,teachersmanlyproposeseveralexamplesofit-stressedsentenceandthenSHillupthemainstructureofit-stressedsentence:Itis/was+stressedparts+that+subordinateclause.Finally,studentswilldolotsofexercisestoconcretethisstructure.Fromthelanguagestructures,“itis/was+stressedpart’’isregardedassubjectand“that+subordinateclause”asobjectorcomplement.WhileaccordingtotheConstrualTheory,‘‘it AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolls/was+stressedpart”canbeseenasfigureand“that+subordinateclause”asbackground.Wecanchoosedifferentperspectiveandthenthedifferentpartscouldbeprominent.Theteachercanshowapictureofvase-face,whichdynamicallyshowsthatwhenyouchoosedifferentperspectivethenyoucanseedifferentfigures.Inthisstructure,whenwefocusonthesubjectorobject,wecanputthembehind“itis(was)”asafiguretohighlight.First,listenerswillbeattractedbythesubjectofit-stressedsentenceandthentheywillbuildacognitivereferencepoint.Whenthebackgroundemerges,listenerscertainlyputthefigureonthebackgroundasafocus.Therearesomeexamplesbelow:(1)Toemphasizethesubjectofthedeclarativesentence.Theearlybirdcatchestheworm.Itistheearlybirdthatcatchestheworm.Thisexampledescribesascene“birdcatchesWOrm”.earlybirdiSsubjectinthefu"stsentenceandtheverb“catch”connectthesubjectwiththeobject‘"worm"’andthewormisbackground.Inthesecondsentence,earlybirdimmediatelycatchesthehearer’Sattention,thefigure‘bird’ismoresalientandthebackgroundhighlightsthefigureandmakeshearer’Sfocusonthefigure.(2)Toemphasizetheobjectofthedeclarativesentencea)Igavewatertothedog.b)ItwasthedogthatIgavewaterto.Thefirstsentencedescribesascene‘‘Igavewatertothedog"’.‘‘I’’isthesubjectinthedeclarativesentenceanditisthefigureofthescene.“givewater"’isamovementthatconnectsthesubjectwithobjectalsothebackground“dog"’.Whenthissentenceischangedtoit-stressedsentence,theformerobject‘‘dog’’islocatedonthesubjectandbecomesanewfigureandimmediatelyattractshearer’Sattention.Theformersubject“I’’becomesbackgroundandmakethefigure“dog"’moresalient.(3)Toemphasizethecomplement小Theyhavepaintedthekitchendarkgreen.b1ItiSdarkgreenthattheyhavepaintedthekitchen.Thefirstsentencedescribesascene“Theyhavepaintedthekitchendarkgreen”.“they’’isthesubjectinthedeclarativesentenceandalsothefigureofthescene.“paint"’isamovementthatconnectthesubjectwiththeobjectandcomplement.Whenthisdeclarativesentenceischangedtoit-stressedsentence,theformercomplement‘‘darkgreen’’islocatedinthesub{ectandisfocusedonbyhearerasthefigure.Thismakestheunimportantcomplementsalientaccordingtochangingthewordsorder.Otherpartsbecomebackgroundtosetoffthecomplement.Thesubjectivechangeofspeakercanmakehearerfocusonthesubject(figure)completelyandcanhaveabetteremphasiseffect(GuanChunxi2008).WithConstrualTheory,teachercanintroducethestructuresofthegrammarinthetraditionalwayandmakeafurtherexplanationforthegrammarstructures.Inthisway, studentscanunderstandt11egrammar’Sdeepermeaningandavoidrecitingthestructuresmechanically.Aftersomeexercises,studentswillrememberthegrammarpointconcretely.Example2.Langackerdistinguishedtwodiffe:rentmentalscanningabilities:sequentialscanningandsummaryscanning.Theyareusedwhenspeakerconstruesasamesituationwithdifferentmethods.Sequentialscanningregardsaprocessionasasequence.Whilesummaryscanningregardsaprocessionasawholeunit.Ateachprocessingmovement,thefocusedconceptionconsistsofallthestatesthusfarscannedthroughtheconceivedtime.Finally,allthecomponentstatesaresimultaneouslyactivated,whichconstituteasinglegestalt.未重。o8§枣\———————————、,—————————√、———,———∥build--upphasefinal(;estaIt4,一,、w⋯Ⅵ**一一“一⋯⋯V~~一*⋯⋯‘V,⋯一、⋯一一≯⋯l、Figure2.1SequentialScanning(a)andSummaryScanning@)InEnglish,Verbbelongstosequentialscanning.Noun,Predictivebelongtosummaryscanning,whenexpressingthemeaningof‘‘giveadvice’’,weCallapply‘‘makeasuggestion"’and“suggest”toexpressthesamemeaning.Accordingtocognitivegrammar,theybelongtodifferentscanningprocess.Nounsareusedtohighlightindividual,eventandabstractrelationsanditemphasizessummaryscanning;verbsareusuallyusedtohighlightprocessingtimeanditemphasizessequentialprocession.Witllthistheory,weCallexplainthedifferencebetweennounandverb.WhenspeakerdescribesascenethatBobcomesintoabuilding,therearetwowaystoexpressthesamesituation.1)a.Bobenteredthatbuilding.b.Bob’Senhanceintothatbuilding.Ina,thescanningmethodof“enter"’issequentialscanning.Inb,thescanningmethodof“enhance”issummaryscanning.Wecallalsoexplaindifferentstructuresof“subject+verb+object+complement"’(svoc).2)a.IsawBobwatchingthatmovieb.IsawBobwatchthatmovie.Both‘‘watchingthatmovie’’and‘‘watchthatmovie’’arecomplementsinthetwo17 sentences.Onesentenceuses‘‘一ingparticiple’’.whiletheotheroneusesinfinite.Becausetheformersentenceadoptssequentialscanning,itemphasizesthemovementwhentheeventishappening.Tllelateroneadoptssummaryscanning,itemphasizesthewholeprocession.Ifteacherexplainsthisstructureinthetraditionalway,therewillnotbeanydifferencebetweenthetwosentences.Theyarejustthesamesentencewithdifferentstructures“seesbdosth’’and“seesbdoingsth”.ⅥmilewithConstrualTheory.teachercouldapplysequentialscanningandsummaryscanningtoexplaintheirinnerdifferences.Inthisway,studentswillunderstandthisstructuredeeply.Aftersomeexercise,theywillmasterthisgrammarconcretely.Example3:whenexpressingasituationthatJohnboughtabookfromTomfor28dollars.Wecanexpressthismeaningforseveralways:1)JohnboughtabookfromTomfor28dollars2、Johnpaid28dollarstoTomforthebook3)TomsoldabooktoJohnfor28dollars.41TomchargedJohn28dollarsforabook.Intraditionalways,teacherjustexplainsthesesentenceswiththesamemeaningbutwithdifferentstructures.珊lilewithConstrualTheory.teachercouldexplainthesesentencesmorespecific。Thesesentencescanbeconstruedwithdifferentperspectivesandhighlightdifferentrelationshipoffactors.Teachershouldtellstudentstherearefourfactorsbuyer,goods,seller,andmoneywhenwementionbuysomething.Whenwechoosedifferentverbsthatwerepresentdifferentrelationshipofthesefactors.ThefirstsentenceJohnboughtabookfromTomfor28dollars.Therelationshipofbuyerandgoodsismadeprominent.ThesecondsentenceJohnpaid28dollarstoTomforabook.Therelationshipofbuyerandmoneyismadeprominent.ThethirdsentenceTomsoldabooktoJohnfor28dol/ars.Wemaketherelationshipgoodsandsellerprominent.ThefourthsentenceTomchargedJohn28dollarsforabook.Therelationshipofmoneyandselleraremadeprominent.A11thedifferentstructuresdependonwechoosewhatperspective.Aftertheexplanation,studentswillknowwhatthedifferencesofthefourverbsareandknowhowtOchoosetherightverbstOexpressdifferentrelationshipsofthefactors.Examplefour:InConstrualTheory,thereisaveryimportantdimension:prominenceorsalience.AndtherearetwofactorsinProminence:profile--baseandtrajectory—landmark.InEnglishGrammar,inversionisacommonphenomenonandtrajectory-landmarkillustratesthethoughtthatEnglishinvertedsentencesareinaccordancewiththesalientprinciplesfromthecognitiveperspective.Trajectory-landmarktheorystatesthatinvertedsentencesmovethetrajectoryofnaturalorderedsentencestotheendoftheinvertedsentences,thatis,speakersusuallyconvert“trajectory—landmark"’inthenaturalsentencesinto“landmark--trajectory’’toformanend.focusandmaketheinformationfocusdroponthenewinformationtoattractlistener’Sattentionandreachthebestsalientresult(YangZhuangchun2003).Iftheadverbialphraseorprepositionphraseisputbeforetheverbinasentence,thissentencecanbecalledfullinversion.Thesephrasescouldbeup,down,in,away,here,there,1R 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文then,off,out,intheroom,on珐Pwalletc.、tVhenteacherexplainsthiskindoffullinversiontothestudents,hecangiveseveralexamplesfirst:1)InalecturehallofauniversityinEnglandsitsaprofessor.2)Southoftheriverliesasmallfactory.3、lOutrushedthechildren4)OnthehorizonappearedalonelyhorsemanThesestructurescanbesummarized‘phrase+verb+subject’,andthesesentencescouldalsobeinnormalorder:5)AprofessorsitsinalecturehallofauniversityinEngland.6)Asmallfactoryliessouthoftheriver.7)Thechildrenrushedout.8)Alonelyhorsemanappearedonthehorizon.Intraditionalteachingmethod,thesesentencesarewiththesamemeaningbutwithdifferentstructures.WithConstrualTheory,teacherCanmakeafurtherexplanation.Inthetrajectory--landmarktheory,trajectoryreferstothemainprominenceandlandmarkreferstominorprominence.Inthenormalordersentences“Zlonelyhorsemanappearedonthehorizon.’’‘‘alonelyhorseman’’isthemainprominenceand‘"onthehorizon”istheminorprominence.Whileintheinversionsentence“Onthehorizonappearedalonelyhorseman”,thespeakerputthemainprominenceintheendofthesentencetomakethemaininformationmoresalient.Thisinversionsentencejustlikesalivelypicturethatisshowedbeforethehearers.“onthehorizon"’isputbeforetheverbasasettingoutpart.Withitsinfluence,thetrajectoryofthepicture‘"thelonelyhorseman’’becomesmoreclearlyandrepresentsthespeaker’Scognitiveprocesstothereality.Sowhenwriterorspeakerwantstoemphasizeapartofinformation,inversionsentenceisoneofthebestways.Anotherexampleisasfollow⋯..TheninaminuteshealsostoodbyUSontherailroadmack,withmyfathersoakedtothewa&t.DownthetracksOBhigherlandstoodthebighouseofthesection--master.Therelightswereburning;everybodyWasup;everybodywaslisteningtothevoiceintheflood.Wehurriedtothetight.⋯”(LiQing,RenSuzhen2008)Inthistext,inversionsentenceisusedinthesecondparagraph.Thewriterputthephrase“downthetracksonhigherland”attheheadofthesentence.Inthisway,notonlythewholesentencelinksupwell,butthesubject“thebighouseofthesection-master"’asatrajectoryisprominent.Thefollowingsentencesdevelopaccordingtothemainprominence.Ifthefirstsentenceinthesecondparagraphisanormalordersentence,themeaningofthesentenceisnotchangedbutthistextcannotgetaprominenteffectofthemaininformation.Whenpeoplereadthistext,theywillgetthisimportantinformationeasilyandfeelreadingthisparagraphfluently. 3.5.1ASampleLessonPlanWiththeaimtohavinganoverviewoftheteachingstrategiesemployedinEG,thefollowingisasamplelessonoftheexperimentalperiod.ToimplementtheConstrualTheoryintogrammarteaching,themostimportantistodesignactivitiestocaterforstudents.Theteachershoulddesigntheteachingactivitiesandintegratethemintolearningmaterials.ThefollowingisateachingplanforModelfourCarnival.IjustwanttogiveallexampleabouthowIteachEnglishgrammarinclass.Time:October10出,2012Place:TheFirstSeniorHi.ghSchoolinJianchangCounty,Class2Grade2Amountsofstudents:61Teachingcontents:NewStandardEnglishstudent’Sbook5.ModeIfourCamivalTeachingObjectives:Inthisunit,thegrammarpartispassivevoice.Thestudentsarerequiredtograspthisstructureindifferenttensesandsomesituationsthatactivevoicetorepresentpassivevoice.Difficultteachingpoints:tobeawareofthemeaningunderthegrammarstructures.Timeduration:45minutesTeachingprocedure:1grammarinthetext2.Exerciseandreinforcement3.Homework(】)Grammarinthetext①DifferenttensesofpassivevoicePassivevoiceismadeupof‘"be+done”.‘‘Be”canbeusedindifferenttenses.Teacher:PassivevoiceiSnottransformedfrompositivevoice.Theybelongtodifferentcomprehensiveprocesstooneevent.Thepositivevoiceisusedwhenthespeakerdescribesaneventfromtheagent’Sperspective.Whilewhenthespeakerdescribesaneventfromthepatient’Sperspective,passivevoiceisused.Nowlet’Slookatapictureonthescreen.(Theteachershowsapicturethatahunterkillsatigerandallthestudentspaytheirattentiononthepicture)Teacher:Nowwhocandescribethispictureforus?StudentA:Thehunterkilledthetiger.StudentB:Thetigerwaskilledbythehunter.Teacher:Well,Bothofyouareright.Let’Slookatthedifferencebetweenthetwosentences.Whenwelookatthispicture,wecanchoosedifferentperspectivetodescribethispicture.Ifyouchoosetigerasafigure,youwilllocatetigeronthesubjecttohighlightandthehunterwillbecomebackgroundtohighlightthefigure.IfIaskyou“Whathappenedlastnight?”.Howdoyouanswerthequestion?StudentA:Thehunterkilledthetiger.20 Teacher:Ok.Howdoyouanswer“whathappenedtothetigerlastnight?’’Student:Thetigerwaskilledbythehunter.Teacher:Allright!Whyshouldweanswerthesetwoquestionsinthisway?Becausewhenwechoosethetigerasourtopic,weshouldexpressitfromthetiger’Sperspective.Ifweanswerthesecondquestionwith“thehunterkilledthetiger’,thehunterastheunknowninformationisputatthelocationofknowninformation,whichisunacceptable.Inpassivevoice,“be’’canbetransformedintodifferenttenses:bedone,willbedone,bebeingdone,havebeendone,etc.Thesubjectsareanpatientsandareprominentasfigures.Forexample:Sheisrespectedbyeveryone.(Simpletense)Thebookwillbereprintedsoon.(Simplefuturetense)Theroadisbeingrepaked.(Presentprogressive)Theyhavebeengivenawarning.(Presentperfecttense)(TheteachershowthesesentencesonPPT,thesubjectsofthesesentenceswereshowedindifferentcolorstOattractthestudents’attentionaspatients)(2)ExercisesandreinforcementAfterexplainingtheusageofpassivevoice,teachershowsaseriesofpicturesforstudentstoaskthemtodescribethepictureswithdifferentperspective.Inthisway,theywillmakesomesentencesincludingactivevoiceandpassivevoice.Inthisway,studentsrecognizethattheywillmakedifferentsentenceswithdifferentperspectives.Ⅵmat’Smoretheywillunderstandwhythestructureisusedlikethis.Andthenteacherwillproposesomequestionstoconcretethestructure.Teacher:NowIet’Sdosomeexercises。Lookat也eexercisesonPPT.1)MrLisaidthosewhohadfailed二一further仃ainingandasecondchancetopasstheexamthenextweek.A.weregivenB.hadgivenC.weretogiveD.wouldbegiven2)⋯-Mycar——twicethismonth.⋯一I"msorrytohearthat.A.hasbeenbrokeninB.hasbeenbrokenC.hasbeenbrokenintoD.wasbrokenintoTeacher:whocangivemetheanswerandtellmewhy?Student:theanswerisDandC.Thefirstoneisallobjectclause,‘"whohadfailed"’isthesubjectoftheclauseandthesentencealsocouldbesaid‘MrLiwouldgivethestudentswhohadfailedasecondchancetopasstheexamthenextweek’,whileintheclauseweshouldexpressthemeaningfromthestudents’perspectives,SOwechoosepassivevoice.砀enextweektellsUSthatit’Spastfuturetense.Teacher:Yes,Thisispassivevoicewithpastfuturetense.Thesecondone,mycarisprominentasasubjectSOweusepassivevoice.Theverbphrasewechoose‘brokeinto’.‘brokein’means‘打破’withoutpassivevoice.31Toapplyactivevoicetorepresentpassivevoice21 Teacher:Languageisn’trestrictedonlybytherulesofgrammar,butpeople’SexperienceandcognitivepaRemscanmakeaneffectontheapplyingoflanguage.Inpassivevoice,thereisastructurethatusesactivevoicetorepresentpassivevoice.Let’Slookatanexample:@Theseshirtswashwell.@ThiscardrivesverysmoothlyInthesetwosentences,thesubjectsbotharepassiveparticipantsintheevent.Whydon’twewritethesetwosentenceslikethistheseshirtsarewashedwellandTh/scar括drivenverysmoothly?Thussentencesrepresentaneventthatpassiveparticipantsmakeanactiveeffectonthehappeningbecauseoftheirinnerfeatures.Thestructureis‘NP+V+Adv’.Therearetwocharacteristicsinthisstructure:1.Thesubjectiscorrespondingtothepatientoftheverbandtheagentisn’texpressedinthesentence.2.Thisstmcturelacksspecifictimegenderandeventgender.Forexample:③Thebookssellfast.@Thebooksaresoldfast.③isatypicalactivevoicetorepresentpassivevoice,while④isacorrespondingpassivevoice.Thesetwosentencesaresimilarinstructure,NPofthetwosentencesbothare‘thebooks’andthetwosentencesbothcontainpassivemeaning.Nowlet’Sanalyzethemeaningofthesesentences.Thebookssellwell.Inthissentence,thebooksarepassiveparticipantbutthebookhasitsinnercharacteristics.Forexample,thisbookwaswrittenbyaveryfamouswriterorthecontentofthisbookisverypopularwithmanypeople.Theseinnercharacteristicsleadtothegoodsell.Althoughthebookisapassiveparticipant,itplaysaveryactiverolebecauseofitsinnercharacteristics.Thebooksaresoldfast.Inthissentence,thebooksarejustanobjectivepatientinthisevent.Now,whocangivemeanexampleaboutactivevoicetorepresentpassivevoice?StudentA:Thedoorwon’tshut.StudentB:Theclothwashedwell.Teacher:Verygood.nowcanyoutellmewhyyoudon’twritethesentencesas“thedoorwon’tbeshut”or“Theclothwillbewashedwell.”?StudentA:ThedoorCan’tbeshutmaybecausethedooritselfbrokeandpeoplecan’tshutit,notbecausethepersonwhoshutthedoordoesn’thaveenoughstrength.StudentB:Theclothwasheswell,becausetheclothitselfissoftorthin.Itisitsinnercharacteristic.Theclothisprominentinthetwosentences,buttheyplaydifferentroles.Teacher:Good.Bothofyouhaveunderstoodtheusageofthestructure.Thesubjectsoftheabovesentencesareallprominentbuttheyplaydifferentroles.Nowyoushouldunderstandwhenwelearnastructure,wenotonlylearnitbymemorizingthestructuremechanically,butweshouldunderstandthemeaningbehindthestructures.(ThentheteacherwillshowsomeexamplesonthePPT,highlightthesubjectsofthesentences.) 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文Thesentencesreadclearly.这些句子读起来很清楚。(即这句子没有歧义)Thesentencesarereadclearly.这些句子被读的很清楚。(指读的人读的好)Afterexplainingthemeaningunderthes由nⅡctures,somes仃uc眦saboutpassivevoicewillbemasteredaccurately.Inthefuture,whenteachinggrammar,teachercoulddesignsomeactivitiestocooperatewiththenewteachingmethod.(3)Homework:Letthestudentsdothefollowingexercisetoconcretetheknowledgelearnedinclass:1Wrehavebeentalkingabouttheissueoftheenvironmentalpollutionforyears.21willaskeverystudentaquestionofEnglishgrammar3Wehaveneverknownthegirltellalie4Theywillhavetoadoptadifferentattitude5Youmustlaysocialemphasisonthechoiceofwords.6W-eknowthattheexpeditionreachedtheSouthPoleinMay3.5.2InstrumentsandDataAnalysisDeviceTheinstrumentsusedinthestudyweretwotests(pretestandposttes0andaquestionnaire.SPSSsoftwarewasusedfordoingstatisticalanalysis.3.5.2.1TestDesignInthisstudy,therearetwotests(pretestandposttest)andaquestionnaire.nepretestwasconductedbeforetheexperiment;itaimstoverifywhetherthecontrolgroupandexperimentalgrouphavesignificantdifferenceintheabilitytolearnEnglish.111eauthorcarriedout50multiple—choicequestionsaboutthegrammarsthatstudentshavelearnedinGradeone.Thetimeoftheexamwaslimitedto90minutes.Posttest:aftertheexperiment,posttestwascarriedoutinbothcontrolgroupandexperimentalgroupforthepurposeofcomparingthedifferenceoftheresultsbetweenCGandEGinthelastweekofNovember.Theposttestconsistsof50multiple-choicequestions:---5areallaboutit-stressedsentencetotestwhetherstudentshavegraspedthemethodofanalyzingthisgrammarpointwithfigure--groundtheory.---7areabout‘subject+verb+object+complement’stmctllretotestwhetherstudentshavelearnedhowtoanalyzethestmctIlrewithmentalscanning.8一12areallaboutpassivevoice,thesequestionsareusedtoteststudents’abilitytoanalyzethes缸1lctIlrewithsubjectiveperspectiveandfendouttheprominentpart.Aftermasteringthestructures,whatismoreimportantistounderstandthemeaningbehindthestlllcture.13—15areaboutfullinversiontoteststudents’abilitytoanalyzewhichpartiSprominentandinwhichconditionthesentenceshouldusefullinversionandtheother35questionsareallaboutthegrammarstheyhavelearnedinthissemester.Eachcorrectanswerisgivenlpointsandthemaximumformultiple---choicequestionsis50points.Therewere120copiesofpaperswith61fromEGand59fromCGcollectedwhenthetestwasover.Thetimefortheposttestwaslimitedto90minutes.(seeappendixB)Questionnaire:therewasaquestionnairewhichwasproceededbeforeandafterthe23 experimenttotheEG.Asforthequestionnairewhichincluded15questions.Itaimstogetageneralpictureaboutstudents’attitudestowardEnglishgrammar,students’learninginclassroomandtheirresponsetowardsleaningEnglishafterclass.ThequestionnairewasprecededtoEGstudentsaftertheaimedtoobtainafeedbackofstudents’assessmentsontheandtestifywhetherthenewteachingapproachwaswelcomedandacceptedbystudents,whetherthenewteachingapproachwaseffectiveandbeneficialforEnglishleaningandteachinginclass.3.5.2.2SoftwareStatisticalanalysesarecarriedoutbyemployingSPSSl6.0(StatisticalPackagefortheSocialScience).ThetwogroupsofdatafromthetraditionalteachingmethodandtheexperimentalteachingmethodintwotestswereprocessedwithSPSStoconductanIndependent-SampleT—testtoverifywhetherthereisasignificantdifferencebetweenthecontrolgroupandtheexperimentalgroupafterpropertreatment.Inaddition,EXCELwasusedtoanalyzetheresultsofquestionnaireaftertheexperiment.24 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文Chapter4DataPresentationandDiscussionIn也ischapter,theauthorwillelaborateontheresearchquestionbroughtup洒thepreviouschapter.Thefirstsectionisthedataanalysisoftheresultsofthepretest,whichtestifieswhetherthestudentsfrombo}thEGandCGareinthesimilarEnglish1evelandthedataofthepretestwiUbeusedtocomparewiththeposttest.ThentheanalysisofposttestiScomparedwiththepreviousoneSOastoseewhethertheConstrualTheorymakeasignificantdifferenceontheEnglishgrammarteachingthanthetraditionalmethod.Finally,thedataofquestionnairepresentedtothestudentswillbeanalyzed,withtheaimtofindoutwhetherthenewteachingmemodimprovestudents’interestsinlearningEnglishthanthetraditionalway.4.1DataPresentationToensurethatthestudentsintheexperimentalgroupandcontrolgrouphaveasimilarabilityoflearningEnglishgrammar,theauthorcollectedthescoresofpretestandcalculatedthecriticaldatalikemean,standarddeviationandIndependentSampleT—testofeachgroup.4.1.1AnalysisofResultsofthePretestThepretest(seeAppendixA)wasdesignedbytheauthorbasedonthematerialsfromthePEPseniorhighEnglishbook.Aspresentedinthepreviouschapter,thepretestwasdesignedtoensuretherewasnosignificantdifferenceofabilitytolearnEnglishbetweensubjectsfromCGandEGbeforetheempiricalresearch.TheIndependentSampleTestwasusedtoanalysistheresultswhichwasshownasfollows:Table4.1GroupStatisticsinthepretestclassNMeanStd.DeviationStd.ErrorMeanPretest5934.89835.78254.75282CGEG6134.86895.45734.69874Table4.2IndependentT-testanalysisofPretestLevene’STestforEqualityofVariancesFSig.PretestEqualvariancesassumed.604.439EqualvariancesnotassumedSig.MeanStd.Error95%ConfidenceIntervalofdf(2一tailed)DifferencetheDifferenceLowerUpper117.023.977..029541.02612—2.0636l2.00470118.977..029541.02612-2.061462.00255 Generallyspeaking,inthepretest,themeanscoreforCGis34.8983andthestandarddeviationiS5.7825;themeanscorefortheEGiS34.8689andthestandarddeviationiS5.45734.Themeanscoresandthestandarddeviationofeachgroupareveryclose.Inaddition,intable4.3,Levene’STestforEqualityofVariancesshowsSig.=0.439>O.05.111eT.testforEqualityofMeansshowsSig.(2-detailed)=O.977>0.05.Asshownintheabovetable,wecanseethepretestshowsthattherewasnosignificantdifferenceonsubjects’proficiencylevelintermsofEnglish.4.1.2ComparisonofPosttestbetweenCGandEGTheposttestwasdesignedbytheauthorbasedonthematerialofGrade2inseniorhighsch001.50multiple—choicequestionswereputouttothestudentsofcontrolgroupandexperimentalgroup.ThesequestionswereallaboutthegrammarsthattheylearnedinthefirstsemesterofGrade2.ThistestWastakeninthe12thweek.Table4.3GroupStatisticsintheposttestclassNMeanStd.DeviationStd.ErrorMeanPosttestCG5935.25425.45702.71044EG6138.44263.68567.47190Table4.4IndependentT—testanalysisofPosttestLevene’STestforEqualityofVariancesFSig.PretestEqualvariancesassumed10.919.001EqualvariancesnotassumedSig.MeanStd.Error95%ConfidenceIntervalofdf(2-tailed)DifferencetheDifferenceLowerUpper101.391.0003.18839.852891.496564.88021118.0003.18839.847551.510004.86677AsindicatedinTable4.3,themeanscoreobtainedbyEGishigherthanthatofCG,specially,35.3542inCGand38.4426inEG.Thatistosay,thedifferencefromtheperspectiveofmeanscoresbetweenCGandEGiSstatisticallysignificant.Asisdemonstratedin4.4.Levene’STestforEqualityofvariancesshowsig.=.001<0.05.SOitrefusesthenullhypothesis.Thatistosay,Std.DeviationofEGiSdifferentfromthatofEG.Inaddition,T.testforEqualityofMeansshowSig.f2一tailed)=.000<0.05.Italsorefusesthenullhypothesis.WecanmakeaconclusionthatthereissignificantdifferencebetweenCGandEGinthescoreofposttest.TheEGhasmadeagreatprogressthantheCG.SubjectsfromEGdo26 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文muchbetterinEnglishgrammarcompetence.TheresultsoftheposttestsupportthehypothesisthattheintegrationofConstrualTheorywouldenablestudentsinEGtohaveabeReracademicperformancethanthosestudentsinCG.4.1.3ComparisonbetweenPretestandPosttestofEGAfterthepost-test,wemadeacomparisonbetweenpretestandposttestofEGItaimedtotestifywhethertheEGmadeaprogressthanbefore.classNMeanStd.DeviationStd.ErrorMeanPretest6134.86895.45734.69874EGPosttest6138.44263.68567.47190EGTable4.6IndependentT-testanalysisofpretestandposttestLevene’STestforEqualityofVariancesFSig.PretestEqualvariancesassumed5.705.018EqualvariancesnotassumedSig.MeanStd.Error95%ConfidenceIntervalofthedf(2-tailed)DifferenceLowerUpper120.000.3.16393.86947-4.88543.1.44244110.593.000.3.16393.86947-4.88692.1.44095TheaimoftheabovetablesiStofindoutwhetherthereiSsignificantdifferencebetweenthetwotestsofEGafter10weekstreatmentonthegrammarlearningwithnewteachingmethod.Fromthetable4.5,itiSshownthatthemeansofscoresobtainedbVEGinthepretestandposttestaresignificantdifferent.38.4426intheposttestand34.8689forthepretest.TheT·sampletestbetweenpretestandposttestofEG,itisindicatedthatSig.(2-tailed)=0.000O.05.Intheposttest.thereissignificantdifferenceinbeforeandaftertheexperimentbecauseP<0.05.Therefore,judgingfromthesedatapresentedabovetheConstrualTheoryindeedmadedifferenceinimprovingstudents’academicperformance.Andthisnewteachingapproachenabledstudentsinexperimentalclasstohaveabetteracademicperformancethanthosewhowereincontrolclass.Inordertohelphighschoolstudentseventuallyeffectivelyextricatefromdifficultyingrammarlearning,itisurgenttoexploreintotheapplicationofConstrualTheorytogrammarteachingandstimulatetheirmotivationandfostertheirinterestinEnglishgrammar.TheresultsshowthattheparticipantswouldspendmoretimeandenergyinlearningEnglish.Bothanalyzeshowthatstudentsprefertothenewteachingmethodratherthanthetraditionalone.32 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文ItcanbeconcludedthatapplyingConstmalTheoryintheEnglishgrammarteachinggivethechanceforstudentstospeakoutinclassandunderstandthegrammarrulesmorecorrectly.Fromthedatacollected,studentsheldapositiveattitudetowardsEnglishgrammarlearning.Theylearnedhowtosolvequestionsthemselves.4.3SummaryTheresearchhastestifiedhoweffectivelythehighschoolstudentslearnEnglishgrammarundertheConstrualTheorydesignedbytheauthorandmadeacomparisonofresultsbetweenpretestandposttestconductedinbothCGandEG.Aquestionnaireaboutthehighschoolstudents’attitudestowardEnglish,theirresponsetowardsEnglishclassroomandafterclasswasdesignedandcollectedbytheauthorbeforeandaftertheexperiment.Inaddition,apretestwascarriedoutamongthesubjects.IthasbeenfoundthattheEnglishgrammarlevelofEGandCGaresimilar.Thetwogroupswereexposedtothesametextbooksandtreated诵ththesameamounttimeof10weeks,duringwhichdifferentteachingmethodswereusedtotwogroups.Attheendoftheterm,theposRestWascarriedouttotestifytheeffectivenessoftheConstrualTheoryforEnglishgrammarteachingandlearningbycomparingwithtraditionalteachingmethod.TheresultsshowthatthereiSsignificantdifferencebetweenthetraditionalteachingmethodandthenewteachingmethodusedbyEG.ThisindicatedthattheEnglishgrammarteachingwithConstrualTheoryusedintheempiricalstudyimprovedthescoresofthesubjects.Thequestionnairewascarriedoutbeforeandaftertheexperiment.Theresultsshowthatstudentsareveryinterestedinthenewteachingmethod.TheyspendmoreenergyandtimeinlearningEnglish.Inaddition,theysuggestteachertogivethemmorechancestoexpressthemselvesinclass.ApparentlythenewteachingmethodstimulatestheirmotivationandinterestinlearningEnglishgrammar.AlltheanalysisofthedataobtainedfromtheexperimentindicatesthattheteachingmethodwithConstrualTheoryiSmoreefficientthanthetraditionalmethodinhighsch001.Andbythecultivationofstudents’cognitiveawareness,theeffectivenessinEnglishgrammaracquisitioncanbeimprovedalot.TeachingEnglishgrammarwiththeknowledgeofcognitivelinguisticisstillavirginlandinchina,andfromtheperspectiveofhighschoolstudents,knowledgeofcognitivelinguisticisquitenewtothem,furtherresearchshouldbedevotedt0thiSarea.33 Chapter5ConclusionThischapterwillmakeasummaryofthemajorfindingsintheresearchands扛essimplicationsforEnglishgrammarteachingandlearning,andalsoaddressthelimitationsoftheresearchandproposesuggestionsforfutureresearch。5.1MajorFindingsIntheprocessoflanguageteachingandlearning,grammarisveryimportant.LanguagelearnersfacethetaskoflotsofboringgrammarstI.ucturestomemorizewhentheylearnEnglisheveryday.Andteachersarealsofacingthetaskofhelpinglearnersunderstandandgraspthemaingrammars砸Jcturesandimprovingtheirgrammarlearningefficiency.Grammaracquisitionisarelativelylongandgradualprocessconsistingofmanycomplicatedstructures.ThispaperisatentativestudyontheapplicationofConstrnalTheorytoEnglishgrammarteachinginseniorhighsch001.ConstrualTheoryconsistsoffivedimensions:Specificity,perspective,figure—ground,prominence,mentalscanning.Withthesefivedimensionstheauthordesignedcertainteachingprocedurestoteachgrammars仃uctures.Italmstohelplearnersmasterthegrammars勺nJctllresmoree伍cientandimprovetheirintereststolearnEnglishgrammar.Withthetheoreticalframework,twotestsandaquestionnairehavebeenmade.Majorfindingsofthisempiricalstudyaresummedupasfollows:1)Theenhancementofconstrualawarenessplaysaroleinhelpinglearnersunderstandtheabstractgrammars仃ucturesmorevisualized.TheConstrualTheoryhelpsstudentsgraspthegrammarstructureswiththeirownexperienceandcognitivepatterns.ThiSevokestheirintereststolearnEnglishgrammaralotandgreatlyimprovetheefficiencyofteachingEnglish.2)Fromtheanalysismadeinthetest,highschoolstudents’abilityofconstrualcallbecultivatednotonlyinshorttermbutalsoinlongterm.Withtheresultreported.mostofthestudentsshowinterestsinthenewteachingmethodandtheyareeagertohavemoreopportunitiestoimprovetheircommunicativecompetenceandspeakoutinclass.5.2LimitationsoftheStudyAlthoughthepresentstudyhasbeencarefullydesigned,it’Sfarfromsatisfactory.Therearestillsomelimitationsduetothelimitationofenergy,time,experimentalenvironmentandsomeotherfactors.Wearenowsunlmarizingthemasfollows.(1)Giventheempiricalstudy,thesubjectsintheexperimentareonlyonehundredorsoandtheinstructiontimeisonly10weeks.Ifmoresubjectsandmoretimehadbeendevoted,thestudywouldbemorereliableandvalid.(2)Therearesomeuncertainfactorsinrespecttoleamingandlearners.TheauthorhastriedherbesttObalancetheexperimentalclassandthecontrolclass,butthestudents’learningmotivation,learningautomationandmanyotherfactorswillmoreorlessinfluencethe34 results.(3)Anotherlimitationconcernsthedesignsofthetest.Thedesignsofthetestareexperienced.oriented.Morescientificdesignsofthetestswillmakethestudymorereliableandconvincing.(4)ItisnotenoughonlybasedonConstrualTheoryforEnglishgrammarteaching.IfmoreteachingmethodswereappliedtocooperatewithConstrualTheory,theeffectwouldbemoreobvious.Forexample,task-basedteachingmethodorinteractiveEnglishteachingmethodcouldbeusedtocooperatewithConstrualTheoryinEnglishclassroom.Asmentionedabove,EnglishgrammarisahugeandcomplicatedsystemwithSOmanylevelsresearched.Becauseofthelimitationoftimeandspaceinthisresearchandtheauthor’Slimitationscopeoftheknowledge,thisresearchcouldonlyinvolvecertainaspectsoftheEnglishgrammar.MoreaspectsareexpectedtoberesearchedwiththeapplicationofConstrualTheory.5.3PedagogicalImplicationsConstrualTheoryWasappliedintoEnglishgrammarteachingrequiresteacherstorenewtheirteachingrationalequickly.Andthenewcurriculumstandardpromotedthatteachersshouldgetridoftraditionalgrammarteachingmethodandmeyshoulddevelopstudents’stronggrammarconsciousnesstoapplythegrammarstructures.EachteacherneedunderstandthedestinationtolearngrammarnotforexambutforexpressingthemselvesinEnglishfluentlyandaccurately.SotheEnglishteachersshouldenlargetheirvision,reconstructtheirknowledgestructureandimprovetheirprofessionalknowledge.BasedontheEnglishlevelofhighschoolstudents,inthecourseofactualEnglishteaching,teachershadbeaerfollowthecognitionrulesoflearnersandcombinetheConstrualTheorywiththetraditionalteachingmethodinaflexibleway.Todevelopstudentscognitiveconsciousnessisbeneficialtogrammaracquisition.IflearnersarefrequentlyexposedtothedimensionsofConstrualTheory,theywillcomprehendagrammarstructurewithConstrualTheorynaturally.InthelightofthefactthatConstrualTheoryisreallynewtostudents,moreclassroomactivitiesshouldbeproposedtoenhancelanguagelearners’cognitiveawarenessandturncognitiveawarenessintoanadditionalchannelforgrammaracquisition.5.4SuggestionsforFurtherResearchThestudyofEnglishgrammarteachingontheConstrualTheoryhasbeenfarfrombeingexploredthoroughly.ConstrualTheoryisacomplicatedcognitivemethodandtheenhancementofcognitiveawarenessplaysanessentialroleingrammarlearningandteaching.IntheviewofprevioustheoreticalandempiricalstudiesontherelationshipbetweenConstrualTheoryandEnglishgrammarteachinginhighschool,thefollowingsuggestionsare0f传redforfutureresearch35 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolI)AlargequantityofempiricalstudyisrequiredforthepurposeofverifyingtheeffectivenessofConstrualTheoryinEnglishgrammarteachingandinauthenticlanguageuse.2)AlthoughthetentativemodelofintegratinganalysisofConstrualTheorywithgrammarteachingdefinitelyprovidesaneffectivechannelforgrammarlearningwithexamplesroughlyorganizedintermsofvehicles,thereisstillmuchdesignandresearchworthytobedonesuchasagedifference,genderdifference,culturaldifference.3)AlthoughtheConstrualTheorycanexplainsomecognitiveprocessofgrammarstructuresandtheirmeanings,itisnotenough.InthecourseofEnglishgrammarteachingteachersshouldintegratethismethodwithotherteachingmethodssuchastask—basedteachingmethod,cooperativelearningetc.theeffectwillbemoreapparent.4)MajorityoftheresearchesarecarriedoutSOfardependingonlinguisticdataorganizedmainlybytheresearcher’Sintrospection.Iftheauthenticdatasuchasthoserandomlychosenfromalargecorpuscouldbeencouragedinthefuture.36 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文References【1】Broccias,C.&B.Hollmann.DoWeNeedSummaryandSequentialScanningin(Cognitive)Grammar?【M].CognitiveLinguistics,2007.【2]Cele-Marcia,M.TheApplicationofanEnglishTeacher’SRolesToMid-schoolClassroom[M].TESOLQuarterly,2002.[3】Croft,William&D.AlanCruse.CognitiveLinguistics[M】.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2004.【4]4Dorgeloh,H.InversioninmodemEnglish:Formandfunction.AmsterdamandPhiladelphia【M】.JohnBenjamin’SpublishingCompany,1997.[5】Ellis,R.TheStudyofSecondLanguageAcquis【M].,..itionOxford:OxfordUniversityPress2001【6]Francis,E.J.TwoPerspectivesontheGrammarofPossession[J】.LanguageSciences,2000(2).【7]Halliday,M.A.K.AnIntroductiontoFunctionalGrammar【M】.London:EdwardArnold,1994.[8】8Hamawand,Z.TheSemanticofEnglishNegativePrefixes[M】.EquinoxPublishingLtd,2005.[9]Harmer,J.HowtOTeachEnglish[M】.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2003.[10]Krashen,S,D。SecondLanguageAcquisitionandSecondLanguageLearning[M】California:UniversityofCalifornia,1981.【11]Krashen,S,D.PrinciplesandPracticeinSecondLanguageAcquisition【M】.PrenticeHall,EnglewoodCliff,NJ,2007.【12]Langacker,R.W.FoundationofCognitiveGrammar[M].California:StanfordUniversityPress.1987.【13]Langacker,R.W.Concept.ImageandSymbol:TheCognitiveBasisofGrammar[M].Berlin:Mouton.1991.【14]Langacker,R,W.TenLecturesonCognitiveGrammarbyRonald【M】.Berlin:Mouton,2007.[15]Lyster,R&Ranta,L.CorrectionFeedbackandLearnerUpdate:NegotiationofforminCommunicationClassrooms【M].StudiesinSecondLanguageAcquisition,1997.【16]Lyster&Ranta.NegotiationofForm,recastsexplicitcorrectioninrelationtoerrortypesandlearningrepairsinL2classroom[M].LanguageLearning,1998.【17]Quirk,Retal.AcomprehensivegrammaroftheEnglishlanguage[M】London:Longman,1985.【18]Reid,Joy,M.LearningStylesintheESL/EFLClassroom[M】.Bejing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2006.[19]Skaehan,Peter.ACognitiveApproachtoLanguageLearning[M].OxfordUniversityPress.1998【20]Taylor,J.CognitiveGrammar[M】.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress,2002.[21]Tusi,A,B,C.UndestandingExpertiseinTeaching:CasestudiesofSecondLanguageTeacher【M】。Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2003.[22】Tyler,A&Evans,V.ApplyingCognitiveLinguistics:AnIntroductionforLanguageTeachers[M].CambridgeUniversityPress,2005.[23]Ungerer.F&H.J.Schmid.AnIntroductiontoCognitiveLinguistics【M】.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2001,[24]Ungerer,F.&H.J.Schmid.AnIntroductiontoCognitiveLinguistics[M】.London:lmngmanGroupLtd.1996[25]Ur,Penny.ACourseinLanguageTeaching:PracticeandTheory【M】.BeijingForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress,2006.37 .A..........S......t...u.....d......y.o....n........t...h.。..e...Ap...。p...。li—c—ati—o—no—f—Constr——ualThe—o—ryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchool[26]UNGERERF,SCHMIDH.J.AnIntroductiontoCognitiveLinguistics[M】.London:AddisonWesleyLongmanlimited,1996.[27]VanPattern,B.InputProcessingandGrammarInstruction【M】.NewYork:Ablex,2002.【28]Widdowson,H.AspectsofLanguageTeaching[M].Oxford:OxfordUniversit)rPress,1990.【29]Woods,E.IntroductionGrammar【M].PengninBooksL缸2007.[30]李卿,任素珍.射体⋯晃标理论下的英语倒装句焦点突显功能【J].青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1).[311关春溪.英语it强调句的图形一背景论分析[J].语文学刊(高校外文版),2008(6).[32]李福印.认知语言学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.[33]潘刚忠.师生关系可操作性效能研究[M].广州:广州出版社,2002.『34]I寅.认知语法概论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006.『35]文旭.语义、认知与识解[J].黑龙江:外语学刊,2007(5).【36]熊学亮,王志军.被动句认知解读一二[J].北京:外语教学与研究,2003(6).[37】徐盛桓.英语倒装句研究[J].北京:外语教学与研究,1995(4).【38]杨壮春.倒装句的认知理据及语用功能[J].黑龙江:外语学刊,2003(6).【39]章振邦,张月祥,强增吉.新编英语语法概要[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1985.[40]赵艳芳.认知语言学概论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2001.38 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文AppendixAPretestAppendixAre-test1、HeiSusedtothemattersthatIdon’tknow.A.dealmgwi也;whattod0withthemB.de“ingwith;howtodealwithC.dowim:whattodowitllD.dowitll:howtodealwiththem2)You’dbetternotphonethemanagerbetween7and8tomorrowevening;he——animportantmeetingthen.A.wouldhaveB.willbehavingC.willhavehadD.willhave3)IfhewantstogotoBeijingtoni#t,hehasnoalternativeblltbyair.A.goB.togoC.goingD.gone41一-Justamoment.Ihaven’tfmishedpackingmysuitcase.⋯..It’Shightimeweleftfortheairport.A.GoaheadB.TakeiteasyC.HurryupD.That’Sfme51⋯一ⅥmatshouldIdowiththispassage?一~themainideaofeachparagraph.A.FindingoutB.FoundoutC.FindoutD.Tofindout6)aroundtheWraterCube.wewerethentakentoseetheBird’SNestforthe2008OlympicGames.A.HavingshownB.TobeshownC.HavingbeenshownD.Toshow7)ThefilmMeiLanfang,——LiMingplaysthestarringrole,hasgaineddrawntheworld’SaRentiontoourtradifionalChineseart.A.whatB.thatC.whichD.where8)Ifhemyadvice,hewouldn’thavelosthisjob.A.followedB.shouldfollowC.hadfollowedD.wouldfollow9)Timisingoodshapephysicallyhedoesn’tgetmuchexercise.A.ifB.eventhoughC.unlessD.aslongaslO)IinvitedJoeandLindatodinner,butofthemcame.A.neitherB.eitherC.noneD.both11)inhealth,hepersistedindoingtheexperiment.A.AshewaspoorB.Poor筋hewasC.PoorwasheD.Poorhewasthough12)Experimentofthiskind——inboththeUSandEuropewellbeforetheSecondW.0rld肠fA.haveconductedB.havebeenconductedC.hadconductedD.hadbeenconducted13)EveryyearafloodoffarmersarriveinShenzhenforthemoney—makingjobsthey——39 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolbeforeleavingtheirhometowns.A.promisedB.werepromisedC.havepromisedD.havebeenpromised14)Thiscoastalareaanationalwildlifereservelastyear.A.wasnamedB.namedC.isnamedD.names15)Inordertofind—betterjob,hedecidedtostudy——secondforeignlanguage.A.the:aB.a:aC.the:theD.a:the16)Peter’SiacketlookediustthesameasJack’S,butitcosthis.A.asmuchtwiceasB.twiceasmuchasC.muchastwiceasD.astwicemuchas——fromthepastperformance,heisnotlikelytodoverywellinhisexams.A.JudgingB.JudgedC.ConsideredD.Considering18)MrLisaidthosewhohadfailed....................——furthertrainingandasecondchancetopasstheexamthenextweek.A.weregivenB.hadgivenC.weretogiveD.wouldbegiven19)Accordingtotheartdealer,thepainting——togoforatleastamilliondollars.A.isexpectedB.expectsC.expectedD.isexpecting20)ofthesurfaceof也eearthcoveredwithwater.A.Two.thirds;isB.Two—third;isC.Two—thirds;are21)ThenewsecretaryA.willarrive22)D.Two·third;areissupposedtoreporttothemanagerassoonasshe......——B.arrivesC.isgoingtoarriveD.isarrivingyoursavingSOfast,oryouwillendupasabeggar.A.StoptospendB.TostoptospendC.StopspendingD.Stoppingspending23)I’11neverforget——youforthefirsttime.A.tomeetB.meetingC.tohavemetD.havingtobemeeting24)Thenewsecretaryissupposedtoreporttothemanagerassoonasshe.............——A.willarriveB.aH"ivesC.isgoingtoarriveD.isarriving25)Jackdescribedhisfather,who——abraveboymanyyearsago,asastrong—willedman.A.wouldbeB.wouldhavebeenC.mustbeD.musthavebeen26)Ihavewatchedthatmovie一⋯it’Ugivemehorribledreams.A.shouldn’tB.needn’tC.havetoD.don’thaveto27)Ihavelostoneofmygloves一——itsomewhere.A.mustdropB.musthavedroppedC.mustbedroppingD.musthavebeendropped28)ItoldSallyhowtogethere,butperhapsI——forher.A.hadtowriteitoutB.musthavewrittenitoutC.shouldhavewrittenitoutD.oughttowriteitout40 29)Myuncleyet.otherwisehewouldhavecalledmetopickhimup·A.mustn’thavearrivedC.can’thavearrived30)Whenhegotmarried,heB.shouldn’thavearrivedD.needn’thavearriveddowninTokyo.A.1ivedB.gotC.tookD.settled31)............DidLindaseethetrafficaccident?⋯一.No,nosooner—thanithappened.A.hadshegoneB.shehadgoneC。hasshegoneD.shehasgone32)⋯.DoyouknowwhereDavidis?Icouldn’tfindhimanywhere·一一Well.Hehavegonef办-一一hiscoat’Sstillhere.A.shouldIl’tB,mustn’tC.can’tD.wouldn’t331Whatapity!Consideringhisabilityandexperience,he——itbeRenA.needhavedoneB.musthavedoneC.canhavedoneC.mighthavedone34)⋯..Therewerealreadyfwepeopleinthecarbuttheymanagedtotakemeaswell·⋯⋯Itacomfortableiourney.351A.carl’tbeB.shouldn’tbeC.mustn’thavebeenD.couldn’thavebeenhistelephonenumber,shecouldn’tgetintouchwithTomandinformhimofthechangeoftheirplane.A.NotknowingB.NottoknowC.HavingknownD.Havingnotknown36、Asf.arasIknow,heisawastefulmail.Heboughteverythingthatpleasedhim,——thecost.A.howeverB.whateverC。evenifD.nomaRer37、)Wehavevarioussummercampsforyourholidays.YouCanchooseyourowninterests.A.eitherB.eachC.oneD.it381⋯.-ShallIhelpcleanthekitchen,Mum?⋯⋯Thankyou.Butyou——itbecauseICalldoitmyself.A。mustn’thavedoneB.wouldn’thavedoneC.mightn’thavedoneD.haven’tgottodo39)Onlyinthisway._tomakeimprovementsA.youcanhopeB.canyouhopeC.youdidhopeD.didyouhope40)⋯一.ShirleywonthefirstprizeintheEnglishspeechcontest.一⋯Wbo!shehasmadesincethebeginningofthisterm!A.WhatgreatprogressB.Howgreatprogress41basedon AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolC.WhatagreatprogressD.Howgreataprogress41)Helenhadtoshout——abovethesoundofmusic.A.makingherselfhearB.tomakeherselfhearC.makingherselfheardD.tomakeherselfheard42)Johnisthetallestboyintheclass,——adcordingtohimsel£A.fivefooteightastallasB.astallasfivefooteightC.asfivefooteighttallasD.astallfivefooteightas43)BettyisverypopularamongUS,becausesheiseasy.A.tobegettingalongB.tobegetalongwithC.togetalongwithD.togetalong44)AlthoughshedidnotknowBostonwell,shemadeherway——toBosonCommon.A.easyenoughB.ellougheasyC.easilyenoughD.enougheasily45)一..Iamgoingtothemall,Mrs,King.Doyouhaveanything?一⋯No.thanks.A.tobuyB.tobeboughtC.boughtD.beingbought46)I——youtheexcitingnews,butyouwerenotathome.A.meanttellingB.meanttohavetoldC.meanthavingtoldD.meanttotell47)Thereason——heWaslateforthemeetingwashewasheldupinatrafficjam.48)A.why;becauseC.why;thatB.that;thatD.that;becausebytheadvancesintechnology,manyfarmershavesetupwindfarmsontheirland.A.BeingencouragedB.EncouragingC.EncouragedD.Havingencouraged49)Johnswimsverywell,butIdon’tliketheway——healwaysshowsoffinpublic.A.whichB.howC.bywhichD.that50)TheywillflytoWashington,A.whereB.theretheyplantostayfortwoorthreedays.C.whichD.when42 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文ApladixBPOSt-testAppendixBost-test1)Peopleseemedtohaveforgottenhowmanyyearsa90-一thepowerstationwasbuiltthere.A.itwasthatB.wasitthatC.itwaswhenD.wasitwhen2)⋯一Inwhichpartoftheplaywas—yourbrotherappeared?⋯.Inthelasttenminutes.A.thatB.whichC.whereD.why3)shewasstandingandwaitingforabusthatshecaughtsightoftheformerPresidentClinton.A.ItwaswhileB.AssoonasC.、ⅣhileD.Duringthetimewhen4)John’SSuccesshasnothingtodowithgoodluck.Itisyearsofhardwork——hasmadehimwhatheiS.A.whyB.whenC.whichD.that5)Itwasplayingcomputergames—costtheboyplentyoftime—heoughttohavespentdoinghomework.A.that;thatB.which;thatC.which;whenD.that;when6)IsawhiIILajacketatthattime。A.wearingB.puttingonC.havingonD.bothAandB7)Listen!Doyouhearsomeoneintheneatroom?A.singingB.singC.tosingD.sang8)Aftergettinglostinastorm,anumberofthenavyteam——fourdayslater.A.rescuedB.wasrescuedC.hasrescuedD.hadbeenrescued9)Iftheywinthefinaltonight,theteamaregoingtotouraroundthec时bytheirenthusiasticsupporters.A.beingcheeredBbecheeredC.tobecheeredD.werecheered10)⋯一Whydon’twechoosethatroadtosavetime?⋯一Thebridgetoit——.A.hasrepakedB.isrepairedC.isbeingrepairedD.willberepairedl1)WDuldyoupleasekeepsilent?Theweatherreponand1wanttolisten.A.iSbroadcastB.iSbeingbroadcastC.hasbeenbroadcastD.hadbeenbroadcast12)Itissaidthatanewrobotbyhimbvnextweek.A.designedB.hasbeendesignedC.willbedesignedD.willhavebeendesigned13)Johntalkedwithmeforaboutanhouryesterday.Never—himtalkSOmuch.A.hadIheardB.didIhearC.IhadheardD.Iheard14)thatshewasoftenpraisedinpublicA.SogoodagirlshewasBSuchagoodgirlwassheC.ShewassuchgoodgirlD.Sodiligentwassheagirl43 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHi【ghSchool15)Johnopenedthedoor.There——-hehadneverseenbefore.A.agirldidstandB.agirlstoodC.didagirlstandD.stoodagirl.16)Accordingtothe——situation,he——hisopiniononhowtodealwiththematterA.present;presentB.presenting;presentedC.presented;presentingD.present;presented171withoursmallapartment,ouruncle’Shouseseemedlikeapalace.A.Comparing;B.ComparedC.TocompareD.Havingbeencompared18)⋯theChristmascard——toMrWhite?一No.itiSstillonthedesk.A.Has;givenB.as;givenC.as;beengiven.ill:begiven19)衔ghtenedUS——atigerturnedupsuddenlyinfrontofus.Itwas;thatB?What;wasC.It;thatwasD.肋at;wasthat20)Mary——adresswhenshecutherfingenA.madeB.iSmakingC.wasmakingD.makes21)Asshe....—...—.thenewspaper,Granny..........——asleep.A.read;wasfallingB.wasreading;fellC.wasreading;wasfallingD.read;fell22).....。..HavefinishedreadingJaneEyre?⋯-No.IA.wasdoing23)Excuseme,I_myhomeworkalldayyesterday.B.woulddoC.hadsoldD.do——1wasblockingyourway.A.didn,trealizeB.realizeC.haverealizedD.wouldrealizing24、fromheartdiseaseforyears,myfatherhastakesomemedicinewithhimwhereverhegoes.A.SufferedB.SufferingC.HavingsufferedD.Beingsuffered25)IstillremembertotheFamenTempleandwhatIsawthere.A.totakeB.tobetakenC.takingD.beingtaking26、IheartheyhavepromotedTom,nuthedidn’tmention——whenwetalkedonthephone.A.topromoteB.havingbeenpromotedC.havingpromotedD.tobepromoted27)Thetreesinthestormhavebeenmovedofftheroad.A.beingblowndownB.blowndownC.blowingdownD.toblowdown28)Somepeopleeatwiththeireyes.Theyprefertoorderwhat—nice·A.100ksB.smellsC.feelsD.tastes29)Afterhebecameconscious,herememberedandontheheadwitharod.A.toattack;hitB.tobeattacked;tobehitC。attacking;behitC.havingbeenattacked;hit30)Atthesightofthe——snake,thereappeareda——lookonherface.44 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文A.terrifying;terrifyingB.terrified;terrifiedC.terrifyra‘g;terrifiedD.terrified;terrifying31)Hestaysuptoolateeverynight,——tocatchupwithhisclassmates.A.determinedB.determiningC.todetermineD.determine32)W|efeeLourdutytomake0111"countryabetterplace.A.itB.thisC.thatD.one33)Thepolice0衔cersinourcityworkhardtherestofuscallliiveasafelife.A.incaseB.asifC.inorderthatD.onlyif34)⋯.whenhasthecountrybeenopentointemationaltrade?⋯一一1987.Isuppose.A.SinceB.InC.FromD.After35)Inpeace,too,theRedCrossisexpectedtosendhelp——thereishumansuffering.A.whoeverB.howeverC.whateverD.wherever36),hetalksalotabouthisfavoritesingersafterclass.A.AquietstudentashemaybeB.QuietstudentashemaybeC.BeaquietstudentashemayD.Quietashemaybeastudent37)Nomatterhow,itisnotnecessarilylifeless.A.adesertmaybedryB.dryadesertmaybeC.mayadesertbedryD.drymayadesertbe38)Hewastoldthatitwouldbeatleastthreemoremonths——hecouldrecoverandreturntowork.A.whenB.beforeC.sinceD.that39)DrSmith,togetherwithhiswifeanddaughter,——visitBejingthisSUIIlIIler.A.isgoingtoB.aregoingtoC.wasgoingtoD.weregoingtO40)Youwillfindtaxiswaitingatthebusstationyoucanhiretoreachyourhostfamily.A.whichB.whereC.thatD.which41)ItwasApril29,2011——PrinceWmi锄andKateMiddletonwalkedintothepalacehalloftheweddingceremony.A.thatB.whenC.sinceD.before42)Asachild,Jackstudiedinavillageschool,——isnamedatterhisgrandfather.A.whichB.whereC.whatD.that43)StephenHawkingbelievesthattheearthisunlikelytobetheonlyplaneLlifehasdevelopedgradually.A.thatB.whereC.whichD.whose44)InChina,thenumberofcitiesisincreasing——developmentisrecognizedacrosstheworld.45 A.whereB.whichC.whereD.that45)Manychildren,——parentsareawayworkinginbigcities,aretakengoodcareofinthevillage.A.theirB.whoseC.ofthem46)ItissaidthatthetoysofthiskindinmyD.withwhomfriend’Stoyshopout,SOdon’tbeafraidthatthey———————.A.havebeensold;don’tsellB.havesold;aren’tsoldC.havesold;don’tsellD.havebeensold;aren’tsold47)⋯.Hehastofinishtheexperimenttoday.Hemustbeinthelab,⋯一ThatiSquitepossible.A.mustn,theB.won’theC.doesn’theD.isn’the481Insomecountries,9somepeopledon’tevenhavefreshwaterorbasichealthcare,reachingthetargetwillbedifficulty,A.where;despiteB.where;although49)B.that;thoughC.which;despitehelpfromtheinternationalcommunity.sodelicious,thefoodinthismarketwassoldoutsoon·A.TastingB.TastedC.HavingbeentastedD.Beingtasted501Thestudentsenteredtheclassroom,smilingand—and—downtohaVetheirlessons.A.tall【ed:satB.talking;sittingC.talking;satD.talked;sitting 辽宁师范大学硕士学住论文AppendixCQuestionnaire实验前,后高中学生英语语法调查问卷本问卷包含客观问题、量表问题和主观题问题。填写此问卷大概需要10分钟,您的数据对我们的研究至关重要,请您认真作答,谢谢合作!(未有说明均为单选)性别:——年龄:——到目前为止你有几年学习英语的经历:——1)你认为学习英语最重要的是什么?A.语法B.词汇C.阅读D.作文2)你学习英语的目的是什么?A.为了应付考试B.为了将来更好地学习打基础C.为了老师和父母3)你对英语语法的学习感兴趣吗?A.有很大兴趣B.比较感兴趣C.不太感兴趣D.一点不感兴趣4)目前的这种授课方式是否让你对自己的语法学习更有信心?A.是的B.不是C.不知道5)你认为自己在英语语法学习的积极主动性方面A.积极主动参与英语学习B。被动接受知识6)遇到不懂的语法题,你会A.向老师同学请教B.查工具书D.不会就放弃7)你觉得英语课堂氛围A.严肃紧张B.枯燥乏味C.轻松和睦融洽8)上英语课时你会昏昏欲睡?A.经常B.偶尔C.从不9)你上课回答关于语法的问题A.上课很沉默,不怎么回答问题B.上课时积极投入按老师要求做,但不主动回答问题C.课上很投入,积极回答问题10)英语课堂上,你对老师讲授的语法内容掌握情况A.完全掌握B.基本掌握C.不太明白11)你用在学英语上的时间与其它课程相比A.多B.不多C.少12)你认为方法对于学习英语语法的重要性A.很重要B,比较重要C.有没有差不多D.不重要13)你是怎样记忆英语语法的?A.死记硬背B。理解句法结构的意义,配合练习C.其它方式14)平时你很积极的完成语法练习吗?47 AStudyontheApplicationofConstrualTheoryinEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHi.ghSchoolA。很积极B。积极15)老师应该如何改进语法教学,C.一般D.拖沓你的建议是 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文AcknowledgmentsThisthesishasbeenfinishedafterthreemonths’hardwork.Intheprocessofwritingthisthesis,Imetlotsofdifficulties.Fortunately,thereweremanypeoplehelpme.Withtheirhelp,patienceandsupport,thisthesiswasfinishedsuccessfully.First,I"dliketogivemygreatgratitudetomysupervisorCuiLin,whowassokindandpatienttoread,criticizeandpolishallthedraftsofthisthesis.IalsowantedtoexpressmygreatappreciationtoalltheprofessorsofEnglishdepartmentinLiaoningNormalUniversity,Ihavelaidafoundationformyresearchworkbecauseofthekinstructionsandlectures.Second,1wouldliketoextendmythankstomyclassmateswhohelpedmeduringmywritingofthethesis.Third,IappreciatedthosewritersandeditorswhosearticlesandbooksIhaveread,andwillbenefitforeven49